| Revision as of 19:19, 10 January 2013 view sourceSeraphimblade (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators46,191 edits Warning on use of rollback← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:13, 11 January 2013 view source Youreallycan (talk | contribs)12,095 edits →taNext edit → | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| :::In every dispute someone has that opinion, you've raised concerns of endless reverts from another editor. This in turn makes you revert them, whether right or wrong and I'm not going into that part, what it ends up being is a disruption, therefore this will force a discourse on the issue. If you wish to make edits there is a process for that even with fully protected pages, and you have the option of going back to the page protection board and asking for it to be unprotected if you feel strongly. ] (]) 10:53, 8 January 2013 (UTC) | :::In every dispute someone has that opinion, you've raised concerns of endless reverts from another editor. This in turn makes you revert them, whether right or wrong and I'm not going into that part, what it ends up being is a disruption, therefore this will force a discourse on the issue. If you wish to make edits there is a process for that even with fully protected pages, and you have the option of going back to the page protection board and asking for it to be unprotected if you feel strongly. ] (]) 10:53, 8 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Yes, full support for that position HIAB - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 10:57, 8 January 2013 (UTC) | ::::Yes, full support for that position HIAB - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 10:57, 8 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ==Inappropriate use of rollback== | |||
| The following edits: and , are not appropriate uses of the rollback tool. Please see the ] for when use of rollback is appropriate. Further inappropriate use of this tool may lead to revocation of your rollbacker userright. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 19:19, 10 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:13, 11 January 2013
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
- Welcome to Youreallycan's talkpage. If you are unable to post here follow this link to post at my unprotected talkpage.
 | This user previously edited as Off2riorob. |
Senior Editor
and is entitled to display this Rhodium
Editor Star.
 |
Welcome |
| If you start a discussion here on my talkpage I will likely respond on this page as I like to keep discussion complete in one location. If you post an imo attacking comment here I will just delete it and you will no longer be welcome on my talkpage untill I remove the restriction.If I feel the discussion is confrontational or attacking I also reserve the right to request you to host it on your own talkpage. If I move the discussion to your talkpage please do not replace it here, I will delete it. Please do not edit war here, this is my talkpage, if I delete or revert your edit don't replace it or escalate disruption on my talkpage, instead please raise your report to an administrator or a relevant noticeboard, thanks |
PRSA GA review
Hey YRC, I was looking at another matter on the Public Relations Society of America article and noticed the GA review. While you did fail it at the time and it is now clearly a candidate for a quickfail, you never took the technical steps to mark it as failed. You should leave a subsequent comment on the GA review and follow the necessary steps to have it noted as failing.--The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 01:33, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ok - thanks Devil's Advocate, I will do that in the near future - best regards and wishes - Youreallycan 07:07, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
About Zhou Jun and other things
Hi YRC. Zhou Jun is now referenced, including one added by me. That said, I'm one of the no doubt many other users that admire your WP:BLP vigilance.
My apologies for not responding to your kind message back in October 2012. I share your concerns about the use of Misplaced Pages for purely commercial ends. A case on point is Aimer, which was cleverly written to avoid G11s and G12s and.. oops, it's been deleted. I'll have to get back to you about that!
--Shirt58 (talk) 10:15, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ha, cool, thanks User:Shirt58 - I appreciate the comment, no worries - regards - Youreallycan 14:02, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Some of your comments were removed because
I removed an entire section begun by a community banned editor here, mostly in the interests of WP:BLP. Your entirely sensible and correct comments were removed at the same time. Unavoidable, but apologies for this! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:05, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Many thanks for the note Demi - really appreciate that. I have come to feel that everything I contribute here and however I try to help improve this place, is reverted or removed because it can be , and its at least nice to get a explanation. Thank you - Youreallycan 23:14, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Can you helpme , ok, you spend your valuable free time helping and bang - some wiki speak revert and thats it - you just waste your time here - Youreallycan 23:24, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Anent nothing above - you might read WP:Tiptibism someday. Collect (talk) 00:12, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh)
International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Why did you request PP? The article is again locked out on the crappiest version any article on wiki which could ever be. I had removed the BLP vio's again. Darkness Shines (talk) 10:34, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- Edit warring of BLP concerned content - its locked at the version you supported and were objecting to - Please make your case on talk or at WP:RFPP for lowering the protection. Regards - Youreallycan
- (talk page stalker)I actually think that's the best thing for the article until the facts can be straightened out. It stops the cycle of add, revert and repeat Hell In A Bucket (talk) 10:41, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- (ec)Sadly no, it is still on the sucky version. Can you look the article over to ensure i have not missed any more vio's? I think I got all the ones sourced to blogs but an extra pair of eyes is usually handy. Hell in a Bucket, the best thing for that article is what I had done, go compare and let me know what you think. Darkness Shines (talk) 10:44, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- In every dispute someone has that opinion, you've raised concerns of endless reverts from another editor. This in turn makes you revert them, whether right or wrong and I'm not going into that part, what it ends up being is a disruption, therefore this will force a discourse on the issue. If you wish to make edits there is a process for that even with fully protected pages, and you have the option of going back to the page protection board and asking for it to be unprotected if you feel strongly. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 10:53, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, full support for that position HIAB - Youreallycan 10:57, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- In every dispute someone has that opinion, you've raised concerns of endless reverts from another editor. This in turn makes you revert them, whether right or wrong and I'm not going into that part, what it ends up being is a disruption, therefore this will force a discourse on the issue. If you wish to make edits there is a process for that even with fully protected pages, and you have the option of going back to the page protection board and asking for it to be unprotected if you feel strongly. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 10:53, 8 January 2013 (UTC)