Talk:Military camouflage: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 00:54, 19 January 2013 editGA bot (talk \| contribs)126,241 editsm Transcluding GA review← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:22, 19 January 2013 edit undoDexDor (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users64,011 edits →Some comments: new sectionNext edit →
Line 23:		Line 23:
	{{Talk:Military camouflage/GA1}}		{{Talk:Military camouflage/GA1}}
	-->		-->

			== Some comments ==

			Some suggestions/proposals for the lead:
			1. The 1st 2 sentences of the lead don't clearly define the subject - is it just visual or does it include radar, IR etc ? The lead sentence should have a link to ]. Maybe something more like "'''Military camouflage''' is the use of ] by a ] to conceal personnel and equipment from visual observation by enemy forces..."
			2. Would a lead pic with some background be better (e.g. File:Arw4.jpg) ?
			3. I think the lead is still a bit too long (for the size of the article). For example the "previously known as" bit, which is specific to (British?) English probably shouldn't be in the lead (especially if it's not elsewhere in the article) - maybe a separate Etymology section.
			4. "camouflage" is in italics which means I'd expect it to be linked to an article about the word ''camouflage'' (e.g. on wiktionary).
			5. "military camouflage was first practised in the mid 18th century" ... "Camouflage was developed for military use ... in 1915" is contradictory.
			] (]) 20:21, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:22, 19 January 2013

Military camouflage is currently a War and military good article nominee. Nominated by Chiswick Chap (talk) at 15:59, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.

A summary of this article appears in camouflage.

Military history: Technology B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Some comments

Some suggestions/proposals for the lead: 1. The 1st 2 sentences of the lead don't clearly define the subject - is it just visual or does it include radar, IR etc ? The lead sentence should have a link to Camouflage. Maybe something more like "Military camouflage is the use of camouflage by a military force to conceal personnel and equipment from visual observation by enemy forces..." 2. Would a lead pic with some background be better (e.g. File:Arw4.jpg) ? 3. I think the lead is still a bit too long (for the size of the article). For example the "previously known as" bit, which is specific to (British?) English probably shouldn't be in the lead (especially if it's not elsewhere in the article) - maybe a separate Etymology section. 4. "camouflage" is in italics which means I'd expect it to be linked to an article about the word camouflage (e.g. on wiktionary). 5. "military camouflage was first practised in the mid 18th century" ... "Camouflage was developed for military use ... in 1915" is contradictory. DexDor (talk) 20:21, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Categories:

Misplaced Pages