Revision as of 11:07, 29 January 2013 editXerographica (talk | contribs)2,148 edits →Unnecessary war: Did you read the reliable sources?← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:16, 29 January 2013 edit undoArthur Rubin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers130,168 edits →Unnecessary war: sources?Next edit → | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*:I didn't say the topic wasn't notable; I said that there is not and is not likely to be anything in reliable sources about the ''topic'', as opposed to about individual wars (necessary, or not). — ] ] 11:03, 29 January 2013 (UTC) | *:I didn't say the topic wasn't notable; I said that there is not and is not likely to be anything in reliable sources about the ''topic'', as opposed to about individual wars (necessary, or not). — ] ] 11:03, 29 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
:::Did you read through all the reliable sources that I included in the article? --] (]) 11:07, 29 January 2013 (UTC) | :::Did you read through all the reliable sources that I included in the article? --] (]) 11:07, 29 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
::::What sources? The material in the article consists only of an unsourced quasi-definition, a list of wars ''said to be'' unnecessary, a "See also" section (mostly irrelevant), and "References" (further reading?) — ] ] 11:16, 29 January 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:16, 29 January 2013
Unnecessary war
- Unnecessary war (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There's no there there. Contains only a list of "unnecessary wars", and a list of "See also" entries, most of which would be inappropriate even if there were an article. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 10:24, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- Let me rephrase that. Not only is there nothing of interest in the present article, I can't imagine an encylopedic article being written. Even a definition would be problematic. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 10:25, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Having served in Afghanistan for a year, it's hard to think of a more notable topic. --Xerographica (talk) 10:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't say the topic wasn't notable; I said that there is not and is not likely to be anything in reliable sources about the topic, as opposed to about individual wars (necessary, or not). — Arthur Rubin (talk) 11:03, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- Did you read through all the reliable sources that I included in the article? --Xerographica (talk) 11:07, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- What sources? The material in the article consists only of an unsourced quasi-definition, a list of wars said to be unnecessary, a "See also" section (mostly irrelevant), and "References" (further reading?) — Arthur Rubin (talk) 11:16, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- Did you read through all the reliable sources that I included in the article? --Xerographica (talk) 11:07, 29 January 2013 (UTC)