| Revision as of 15:12, 10 February 2013 view sourceNeotarf (talk | contribs)4,029 edits read and archive← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:29, 3 March 2013 view source Apteva (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,591 edits →Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Retired}} | {{Retired}} | ||
| == Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement == | |||
| Per ], please refrain from personalizing discussions. There are hundreds of RFC/U's. Adding "There was one for Apteva." is completely unnecessary, and completely inappropriate. "Er, shouldn't there be an RFC/U or something? There was one for Apteva." —Neotarf (talk) 15:58, 27 February 2013 (UTC) ] (]) 08:29, 3 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:29, 3 March 2013
Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement
Per WP:FOC, please refrain from personalizing discussions. There are hundreds of RFC/U's. Adding "There was one for Apteva." is completely unnecessary, and completely inappropriate. "Er, shouldn't there be an RFC/U or something? There was one for Apteva." —Neotarf (talk) 15:58, 27 February 2013 (UTC) Apteva (talk) 08:29, 3 March 2013 (UTC)