| Revision as of 13:31, 18 February 2013 editDegenFarang (talk | contribs)2,116 edits →Carmen Media← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:32, 18 February 2013 edit undoDegenFarang (talk | contribs)2,116 edits →Carmen MediaNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| :{{la|Carmen Media}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | :{{la|Carmen Media}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | ||
| :({{Find sources|Carmen Media}}) | :({{Find sources|Carmen Media}}) | ||
| {{{text}}} | |||
| Not notable, no sources, likely created by the subject or their associates. ] (]) 23:35, 17 February 2013 (UTC) | Not notable, no sources, likely created by the subject or their associates. ] (]) 23:35, 17 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment'''. I found a news reference at www.online-casinos.com/news/news2200.asp but that site appears to be blacklisted. <font face="Times">'''] (] • ])'''</font > 23:40, 17 February 2013 (UTC) | *'''Comment'''. I found a news reference at www.online-casinos.com/news/news2200.asp but that site appears to be blacklisted. <font face="Times">'''] (] • ])'''</font > 23:40, 17 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:32, 18 February 2013
Carmen Media
- Carmen Media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, no sources, likely created by the subject or their associates. DegenFarang (talk) 23:35, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Comment. I found a news reference at www.online-casinos.com/news/news2200.asp but that site appears to be blacklisted. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:40, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Some court cases involving this company and internet gambling are cited in this Google Books search. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:54, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:40, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 February 18. Snotbot t • c » 00:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Nom has AFD'd a batch of articles created by User:2005 as part of what appears to be an ongoing feud between these two editors. Such a waste of the community's time should not be condoned. Toohool (talk) 07:55, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- The ad hominem attack is not appropriate or appreciated. Please discuss content and not people. Do you have a specific objection to this article being deleted? DegenFarang (talk) 13:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC)