Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Carmen Media: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:32, 18 February 2013 editDegenFarang (talk | contribs)2,116 edits Carmen Media← Previous edit Revision as of 16:04, 18 February 2013 edit undoIhcoyc (talk | contribs)30,401 edits Carmen Media: deleteNext edit →
Line 11: Line 11:
*'''Speedy Keep''' Nom has AFD'd a batch of articles created by ] as part of what appears to be an ongoing feud between these two editors. Such a waste of the community's time should not be condoned. ] (]) 07:55, 18 February 2013 (UTC) *'''Speedy Keep''' Nom has AFD'd a batch of articles created by ] as part of what appears to be an ongoing feud between these two editors. Such a waste of the community's time should not be condoned. ] (]) 07:55, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
::The ad hominem attack is not appropriate or appreciated. Please discuss content and not people. Do you have a specific objection to this article being deleted? ] (]) 13:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC) ::The ad hominem attack is not appropriate or appreciated. Please discuss content and not people. Do you have a specific objection to this article being deleted? ] (]) 13:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Unreferenced article about a commercial business. My understanding is that litigation reports generally are not enough to confer ], nor is trade coverage on a website about online casinos. The current article text is advertising. - ] - ] 16:04, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:04, 18 February 2013

Carmen Media

Carmen Media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, no sources, likely created by the subject or their associates. DegenFarang (talk) 23:35, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 23:40, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
The ad hominem attack is not appropriate or appreciated. Please discuss content and not people. Do you have a specific objection to this article being deleted? DegenFarang (talk) 13:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Categories: