Revision as of 13:32, 18 February 2013 editDegenFarang (talk | contribs)2,116 edits →Carmen Media← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:04, 18 February 2013 edit undoIhcoyc (talk | contribs)30,401 edits →Carmen Media: deleteNext edit → | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Speedy Keep''' Nom has AFD'd a batch of articles created by ] as part of what appears to be an ongoing feud between these two editors. Such a waste of the community's time should not be condoned. ] (]) 07:55, 18 February 2013 (UTC) | *'''Speedy Keep''' Nom has AFD'd a batch of articles created by ] as part of what appears to be an ongoing feud between these two editors. Such a waste of the community's time should not be condoned. ] (]) 07:55, 18 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
::The ad hominem attack is not appropriate or appreciated. Please discuss content and not people. Do you have a specific objection to this article being deleted? ] (]) 13:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC) | ::The ad hominem attack is not appropriate or appreciated. Please discuss content and not people. Do you have a specific objection to this article being deleted? ] (]) 13:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
*'''Delete'''. Unreferenced article about a commercial business. My understanding is that litigation reports generally are not enough to confer ], nor is trade coverage on a website about online casinos. The current article text is advertising. - ] - ] 16:04, 18 February 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:04, 18 February 2013
Carmen Media
- Carmen Media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, no sources, likely created by the subject or their associates. DegenFarang (talk) 23:35, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Comment. I found a news reference at www.online-casinos.com/news/news2200.asp but that site appears to be blacklisted. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:40, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Some court cases involving this company and internet gambling are cited in this Google Books search. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:54, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:40, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 February 18. Snotbot t • c » 00:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Nom has AFD'd a batch of articles created by User:2005 as part of what appears to be an ongoing feud between these two editors. Such a waste of the community's time should not be condoned. Toohool (talk) 07:55, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- The ad hominem attack is not appropriate or appreciated. Please discuss content and not people. Do you have a specific objection to this article being deleted? DegenFarang (talk) 13:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Unreferenced article about a commercial business. My understanding is that litigation reports generally are not enough to confer notability on a business, nor is trade coverage on a website about online casinos. The current article text is advertising. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:04, 18 February 2013 (UTC)