| Revision as of 23:42, 18 February 2013 editVegaswikian (talk | contribs)270,510 edits Obvious keep← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:09, 19 February 2013 edit undo2005 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers25,389 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| No sources, likely created by the source of the article or their associates. ] (]) 23:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC) | No sources, likely created by the source of the article or their associates. ] (]) 23:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' and ] the above editor! This is the major gaming industry association in the US. Having an article without a large number of citations is not a reason to delete. Neither is a failure to ] on the part of the nominator. ] (]) 23:42, 18 February 2013 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' and ] the above editor! This is the major gaming industry association in the US. Having an article without a large number of citations is not a reason to delete. Neither is a failure to ] on the part of the nominator. ] (]) 23:42, 18 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Speedy keep'''. Ludicrous hounding nomination. today. ] (]) 20:09, 19 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:09, 19 February 2013
No sources, likely created by the source of the article or their associates. DegenFarang (talk) 23:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep and trout slap the above editor! This is the major gaming industry association in the US. Having an article without a large number of citations is not a reason to delete. Neither is a failure to assume good faith on the part of the nominator. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:42, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Ludicrous hounding nomination. 146 google news mentions today. 2005 (talk) 20:09, 19 February 2013 (UTC)