Revision as of 20:09, 19 February 2013 edit2005 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers25,389 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:54, 19 February 2013 edit undoRray (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,856 edits keepNext edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*'''Keep''' and ] the above editor! This is the major gaming industry association in the US. Having an article without a large number of citations is not a reason to delete. Neither is a failure to ] on the part of the nominator. ] (]) 23:42, 18 February 2013 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' and ] the above editor! This is the major gaming industry association in the US. Having an article without a large number of citations is not a reason to delete. Neither is a failure to ] on the part of the nominator. ] (]) 23:42, 18 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
*'''Speedy keep'''. Ludicrous hounding nomination. today. ] (]) 20:09, 19 February 2013 (UTC) | *'''Speedy keep'''. Ludicrous hounding nomination. today. ] (]) 20:09, 19 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep''' per 2005 and Vegaswikian above. ] (]) 20:54, 19 February 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:54, 19 February 2013
No sources, likely created by the source of the article or their associates. DegenFarang (talk) 23:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep and trout slap the above editor! This is the major gaming industry association in the US. Having an article without a large number of citations is not a reason to delete. Neither is a failure to assume good faith on the part of the nominator. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:42, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Ludicrous hounding nomination. 146 google news mentions today. 2005 (talk) 20:09, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep per 2005 and Vegaswikian above. Rray (talk) 20:54, 19 February 2013 (UTC)