| Revision as of 16:30, 20 February 2013 editGiantSnowman (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators597,784 editsm heading← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:33, 20 February 2013 edit undoDLMcN (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,269 editsm Next edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| == Great Zimbabwe - again ! == | == Great Zimbabwe - again ! == | ||
| Giant Snowman - Many thanks for offering to help (18:51, 17 February). Please take another look at the recent history of "Great Zimbabwe". User "Waslalh" did at least come on to the Talk-Page (although he did not really seem to grasp the essential point - i.e., that people |
Giant Snowman - Many thanks for offering to help (18:51, 17 February). Please take another look at the recent history of "Great Zimbabwe". User "Waslalh" did at least come on to the Talk-Page (although he did not really seem to grasp the essential point - i.e., that people do exist who support the Lemba Theory). However, as you will see, User 86.60.65.22 has recently reverted sourced text ''twice'' within the space of just a few minutes. Is it possible to 'Lock' the "Great Zimbabwe" file, please, at least for a while? ... DougWeller and I did agree on a compromise text at 16:25 on 17 Feb.... Gratefully, --] (]) 16:30, 20 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:33, 20 February 2013
 Archives |
User:SuzanneOlsson
Hello GiantSnowman. Since you closed the debate on an editing restriction, do you want to enter the result in WP:RESTRICT? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 15:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, that takes care of it, thank you. EdJohnston (talk) 16:53, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- I have now explained to her what "broadly construed" means since she was apparently thinking she only got banned from editing the main article Roza Bal. De728631 (talk) 19:47, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, sadly. Could you please explain to her whether continuing Talk page edits are allowed. Personally I have no objection, but the close appears to include Talk pages? In ictu oculi (talk) 09:27, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- I have now explained to her what "broadly construed" means since she was apparently thinking she only got banned from editing the main article Roza Bal. De728631 (talk) 19:47, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
February 2013
Hi! What I've added in IFFHS is not my personal analysis but a translation of the german-language source I've already used as a reference in the article. Isksin (talk) 17:16, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Those aren't muskets/Micheal swaim?
I saw you recently deleted the Those Aren't Muskets page and i believe Micheal Swaim's page for being "not notable" and was wondering if there's any way of getting them back up? Just seeing if there's a chance, Thanks! Mango57 (talk) 00:17, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Mango57
Strongvibration
thanks for your concern , best regard, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Strongvibration (talk • contribs) 16:22, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
Great Zimbabwe - again !
Giant Snowman - Many thanks for offering to help (18:51, 17 February). Please take another look at the recent history of "Great Zimbabwe". User "Waslalh" did at least come on to the Talk-Page (although he did not really seem to grasp the essential point - i.e., that people do exist who support the Lemba Theory). However, as you will see, User 86.60.65.22 has recently reverted sourced text twice within the space of just a few minutes. Is it possible to 'Lock' the "Great Zimbabwe" file, please, at least for a while? ... DougWeller and I did agree on a compromise text at 16:25 on 17 Feb.... Gratefully, --DLMcN (talk) 16:30, 20 February 2013 (UTC)