| Revision as of 10:59, 24 February 2013 editDeacon of Pndapetzim (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators39,745 edits →Deletion review for User:Deacon of Pndapetzim/oblivion← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:00, 24 February 2013 edit undoDeacon of Pndapetzim (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators39,745 edits →Deletion review for User:Deacon of Pndapetzim/oblivionNext edit → | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
| An editor has asked for a ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. <!-- This originally was from the template {{subst:DRVNote|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~ --> --''']]]''' 10:40, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | An editor has asked for a ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. <!-- This originally was from the template {{subst:DRVNote|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~ --> --''']]]''' 10:40, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| A mob of mean-spirited self-entitled fools |
A mob of mean-spirited self-entitled fools. While you run around wasting your own time looking for various actions and trying to undelete what is basically a sandbox mixed with some Edwardsbot spam to forcibly deny a departing user some privacy on an extremely expansive interpretation of some guideline, you don't even realise that my talkpage still exists. Well, enjoy yourselves! ] (<small>]</small>) 10:32, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:00, 24 February 2013
Siol Alpin
Glad to see you back at the keyboard. If you have a mo' could you take a look at Siol Alpin? Ben MacDui 10:51, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think you'd be too surprised to hear what I think of that article! :) Always stayed away from clan articles; pretty much everyone knows clan articles will be trash, so as long as the guys behind them stayed away from mainstream articles I always just left them to it. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 17:05, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
- When you say "everyone" I fear you are not including our dear readers. Sadly, I have next to no decent material on the subject, but no matter - the wikiworld is large and I have quite enough on my watch list already. Ben MacDui 21:14, 16 December 2012 (UTC).
- Maybe, but c'est la vie. You work on productive areas and those are probably the best areas. :) Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 18:25, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
What's with frying the history?
I thought talk pages were supposed to stay more-or-less intact.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:40, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
- Well, dunno about that. You'd need to ask the Strong of Misplaced Pages. They make the rules up as they go along and I don't get their newsletter. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 18:46, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
So long and thanks for all the fish^Whelp!
Hope by the time I unretire myself you'll have changed your mind. If not, very best wishes for the future. Look forward to seeing a book in print with your name on the cover. (I'll be after a signed copy.) Thanks for all your help over the years, Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:37, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
- Haha, no bother. Mind that door's not closed to you. Just email if youever need anything. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 11:15, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Likewise. And I can't say I blame you... Misplaced Pages has long ceased to be an attractive or worthwhile endeavour for those with actual professional expertise in a field. Not when equal value is given to the opinions of a Canadian teenager who once saw Braveheart. Good luck. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 09:33, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
- Sadly this place has more problems than that. Thanks for the kind words and good luck to yourself!Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 11:15, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Yes saw you tidying up and knew what was coming. Very sorry to see you go and wish you all the best for the future. Can truly say that your contributions to the bit of WP that I used to enjoy will be impoverished immensely. When I see that new insight into our medieval history in print, I'll know the style. All the very best, Bill --Bill Reid | (talk) 17:37, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the kind words, Bill! The great thing these days is that the quality of contributions to that area, your own included, is very high. Certainly the area is at a different level than when I started all those years ago. Don't forget to email if you need anything! Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 18:06, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Deletion review for User:Deacon of Pndapetzim/oblivion
An editor has asked for a deletion review of User:Deacon of Pndapetzim/oblivion. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --Rschen7754 10:40, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
A mob of mean-spirited self-entitled fools. While you run around wasting your own time looking for various actions and trying to undelete what is basically a sandbox mixed with some Edwardsbot spam to forcibly deny a departing user some privacy on an extremely expansive interpretation of some guideline, you don't even realise that my talkpage still exists. Well, enjoy yourselves! Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 10:32, 24 February 2013 (UTC)