Misplaced Pages

User talk:HistoryofIran: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:04, 1 March 2013 editDawn Bard (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers37,669 edits Warning: Edit warring on Buyid dynasty. (TW)← Previous edit Revision as of 06:11, 2 March 2013 edit undoEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,208 edits Reported: WP:ANI#Disruptive editing on Buyid dynastyNext edit →
Line 38: Line 38:


You were warned. You have been reported. --] (]) 21:59, 1 March 2013 (UTC) You were warned. You have been reported. --] (]) 21:59, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
:HistoryofIran, your edits are being discussed by administrators. See ]. You may respond there if you wish. If you don't stop reverting at ] it is likely you will be blocked from editing. ] (]) 06:11, 2 March 2013 (UTC)


== March 2013 == == March 2013 ==

Revision as of 06:11, 2 March 2013

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Misplaced Pages:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Misplaced Pages

The Misplaced Pages tutorial is a good place to start learning about Misplaced Pages. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! J8079s (talk) 18:23, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

AA2

Please be aware of Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2 before making further reverts. Please bear in mind that the article Azerbaijani people is covered by arbitration ruling, and admins can place editors who make excessive reverts on editing restrictions. Thanks. Grandmaster 20:28, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013

Hello, I'm TheSuave. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Zaza people, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Suave 15:49, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

It appears that your edits were deleting citations, which registered as removal of content, however, having looked at the references, one of them is in a foreign language, and other is a dead link. The Joshua Project citation is not reliable, so I now agree with your previous edit and will be undoing my reversion. Thanks for bringing that to my attention. Suave

Warning for Buyid dynasty

I see you are determined to remove Kurd/Kurdish from the Buyid dynasty. Your last removal was under the guise of adding a source for Daylamite origin and can be considered disruptive editing along with the false edit summary. If you remove Kurd/Kurdish from the article again without consensus, I will report you for disruptive editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:33, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Reported

You were warned. You have been reported. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:59, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

HistoryofIran, your edits are being discussed by administrators. See WP:ANI#Disruptive editing on Buyid dynasty. You may respond there if you wish. If you don't stop reverting at Buyid dynasty it is likely you will be blocked from editing. EdJohnston (talk) 06:11, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Buyid dynasty. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Dawn Bard (talk) 22:04, 1 March 2013 (UTC)