| Revision as of 15:35, 14 March 2013 editScientiom (talk | contribs)1,799 edits done with this collaboration :)← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:35, 14 March 2013 edit undoScientiom (talk | contribs)1,799 edits notedNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| Thanks! Now you made me hungry again - coincidentally I had a strawberry milkshake about 2 hours ago. Heh Heh. :P --] (]) 16:22, 1 March 2013 (UTC) | Thanks! Now you made me hungry again - coincidentally I had a strawberry milkshake about 2 hours ago. Heh Heh. :P --] (]) 16:22, 1 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ==] rename?== | |||
| Hi Scientiom, shouldn't this article be renamed to homosexual propaganda? That would be the ] after all since we don't call homophobia non-heterosexuality and since this title seems biased to me. | |||
| </br>And the lede wouldn't have to change too much to become something like: ''Homosexual propaganda (or gay propaganda) is a perceived tactic some accuse homosexual and sometimes other non-heterosexual people of using to recruit others and/or gain acceptance.'' | |||
| </br>What do you think? Thanks ''']<font color="purple">]</font> <sup>(])</sup>''' 11:04, 8 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :I believe this article is about anti-LGBT rhetoric? --] (]) 11:19, 8 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::No, it's about homophobic propaganda, commonly called homosexual or gay propaganda, not homophobic propaganda. If it's about anti-LGBT rhetoric then it needs a rename anyway or a merge into homophobia. This is the same reason we have a homophobia article instead of an opposition to gay people or non-heterosexual article. This name doesn't strike me as neutral. Do you see what i mean? Thanks ''']<font color="purple">]</font> <sup>(])</sup>''' 11:36, 8 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :I've decided to continue adding to my sandbox article. We can always merge later if it's decided they're similar enough. Thanks ''']<font color="purple">]</font> <sup>(])</sup>''' 16:21, 13 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Alright. Good luck with your work on that! :) --] (]) 12:59, 14 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thanks | |||
| :::I've ended up at DRN due to a discussion with the IP you reverted . I'm just letting you know in advance as you might be called up at some stage. <small>I don't know...I don't really like DRN or being called to go there and it's a reason i don't edit controversial stuff as much anymore.</small> Thanks ''']<font color="purple">]</font> <sup>(])</sup>''' 13:41, 14 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:35, 14 March 2013
Hatnote
I just added a hatnote to the SSM article. Does it address the concerns you mentioed yesterday? Pass a Method talk 18:11, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Just letting you know...
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is User:Little green rosetta reported by User:StillStanding-247 (Result: ). Thank you. —StAnselm (talk) 10:33, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
ANI
Hello. There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User North8000 disruptive talk page editing at talk:Homophobia. Thank you. - MrX 19:58, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
A bowl of strawberries for you!
|
I just wanted to drop by to welcome you back. We missed your contributions. Cheers. - MrX 16:14, 1 March 2013 (UTC) |
Thanks! Now you made me hungry again - coincidentally I had a strawberry milkshake about 2 hours ago. Heh Heh. :P --Scientiom (talk) 16:22, 1 March 2013 (UTC)