Misplaced Pages

User talk:North Atlanticist Usonian: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:35, 14 March 2013 editStAnselm (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers160,586 edits Same-sex marriage: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 00:13, 15 March 2013 edit undoStAnselm (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers160,586 edits Same-sex marriageNext edit →
Line 52: Line 52:


Sorry, I thought you must have seen it, since it came up on the - a very long comment in the article about not adding items to the list. I don't know who inserted it, or when, but it seems that we should abide by it while it remains. ]] (]) 23:35, 14 March 2013 (UTC) Sorry, I thought you must have seen it, since it came up on the - a very long comment in the article about not adding items to the list. I don't know who inserted it, or when, but it seems that we should abide by it while it remains. ]] (]) 23:35, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
:Heh. Well, your initial point stands - it isn't meant to be an exhaustive list, and new entries should not be added without discussion. ]] (]) 00:13, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:13, 15 March 2013

Can i help you? Just leave a message in the orthodox fashion below. Please remember to sign.

Archive 1


The Signpost: 03 September 2012

WikiProject Cleanup

Hello, Pass a Method.

You are invited to join WikiProject Cleanup, a WikiProject and resource for Misplaced Pages cleanup listings, information and discussion.
To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000 16:56, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

The Teahouse Turns One!

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!


Teahouse First Birthday Badge Teahouse First Birthday Badge
Awarded to everyone who participated in the Misplaced Pages Teahouse during its first year!

To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:22, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

Hello, Pass a Method. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Book of Leviticus.The discussion is about the topic Book of Leviticus. Thank you. - MrX 03:16, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

WP:V

G'day. Saw your post to my talkpage the other day. I think the wording as it was should have applied to this particular situation. However, the general view seems to be that if one has enough friends that can be contacted offline, things like "consider" and "should" and most of the editing policy and so on don't apply. ˜danjel  00:56, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Pope Francis

Please stop trying to insert the "devil" quote into the Pope Francis article. First off the source you are using doesn't meet RS standards for the translation, second, the actual quote is already in the article from a source that is reliable. Marauder40 (talk) 12:57, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Same-sex marriage

Sorry, I thought you must have seen it, since it came up on the diff - a very long comment in the article about not adding items to the list. I don't know who inserted it, or when, but it seems that we should abide by it while it remains. StAnselm (talk) 23:35, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Heh. Well, your initial point stands - it isn't meant to be an exhaustive list, and new entries should not be added without discussion. StAnselm (talk) 00:13, 15 March 2013 (UTC)