Misplaced Pages

User talk:Second Quantization: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:28, 29 March 2013 edit93.136.16.90 (talk) Biocentrism move proposal← Previous edit Revision as of 23:55, 31 March 2013 edit undoSecond Quantization (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers24,876 edits archiveNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:


{{Attempting wikibreak}} {{Attempting wikibreak}}

==The TM topic==
Hi IRWolfie and welcome to the TM topic area. I’ve noticed that you have removed significant amounts of sourced content without discussion or consensus. Being new to the topic area you may be unaware of the TM ArbCom and that the articles in the topic fall under its discretionary sanctions including In light of this you might consider self-reverting the edits below and discussing them on the talk page before removing the material again.
*In you removed text along with 7 sources.
*In you removed text and 3 sources.
*In you removed a large amount of content along with 4 sources.
Thanks for your input and good faith efforts to improve the articles in and around the TM topic. Best,--<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,sans -serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 17:41, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
::If you wish to discuss the issue, specifically material that violates ] or ], address my specific concerns on the talk page. You are also inadvertently misrepresenting the arbcom statement. It is a statement of principles that hold for all of wikipedia and refers to material removed during the initial collaboration process; ''not material which has been in an article for some time''. It also does not indicate that it is a specific sanction in TM, you have misrepresented this.
::I am well used to editing fringe articles, I am a ] regular, and Fringe topics are the bulk of my edits. Thus I have much experience with ], ], ] P&G and its applications. In light of the fact that you provide absolutely no rationale in policy for why I should revert myself I am going to ignore your request. I also suggest if you want to challenge my edits, provide an actual reason; saying my edits are too ] is itself not a valid rationale for a revert ]: "''BRD is not a valid excuse for reverting good-faith efforts to improve a page simply because you don't like the changes. Don't invoke BRD as your reason for reverting someone else's work or for edit warring: instead, provide a reason that is based on policies, guidelines, or common sense.''". Note that fringe topics are themselves under discretionary sanctions ]. ] (]) 11:06, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
:::Thanks IRWolfie for your reply. My purpose was to politely inform you of the discretionary sanctions that apply to the TM topic. You may chose to interpret them or respond to them in any way that you like. Best, --<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,sans -serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 12:49, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
::::You did more than that, you made specific claims regarding extra sanctions on TM by ArbCom. The claims were not factually correct. ] (]) 11:19, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

==Talkback==
{{talkback|I dream of horses|ts=17:21, 27 March 2013 (UTC)}}

== A barnstar for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thanks for all your efforts attempting to keep Misplaced Pages neutral. ] (] · ] · ]) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 05:36, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
|}
::Cheers, :) ] (]) 20:13, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

==Maque==
Have some respect. Remember I don't know you. I'm a teacher of Physics indeed but for you I'm Prof.Maque.] (]) 07:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

== Biocentrism move proposal ==

Seeing your edits there, it seems you might be interested in the ]. :) ] (]) 11:16, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
:Yep, I'll comment. Don't forget that you are required to notify people in a non-partisan way (per ]). ] (]) 11:22, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
::Thanks for reminder! I've notified every participant of the last move discussion. ] (]) 11:28, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:55, 31 March 2013

Archive 1,2,3,4, 5 /Suggestion Box

Template:Attempting wikibreak