| Revision as of 07:48, 24 May 2006 editSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 editsm →New passage is a translation; sources see german article← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:52, 24 May 2006 edit undoForeigner (talk | contribs)418 edits →New passage is a translation; sources see german article: (editing conflict)Next edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| ::But, alas!, I'll give you a original source which is also quoted in the German Article, please see | ::But, alas!, I'll give you a original source which is also quoted in the German Article, please see | ||
| * von ], einem Publizisten der ] | ::* von ], einem Publizisten der ] | ||
| ::in translation it means roughly speaking | |||
| * by ], a publicist who is conciderd to be ] | |||
| ::] 07:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::We need them in this article, not in the German one. Please review our content policies. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 07:48, 24 May 2006 (UTC) | :::We need them in this article, not in the German one. Please review our content policies. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 07:48, 24 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 07:52, 24 May 2006
IDGR frequently blamed to be Far-left
see the german article the english article is based on, have a look at the history , have a look at the discussion history (Yes, they realy do reverts on the discussion) too. IDGR claims to be anti-Fascist, its oponents say it is Ultra leftism. (Not my personal opinion, I do share none of them) Foreigner 15:56, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
New passage is a translation; sources see german article
pleases goto
and, if you like compare it with the orgiginal lemma http://de.wikipedia.org/Informationsdienst_gegen_Rechtsextremismus
you are more than welcome to proof the history and the facts if u can read german, for sample http://de.wikipedia.org/Informationsdienst_gegen_Rechtsextremismus
of course, there's a little debate too, u can also find a plenty of sources there http://de.wikipedia.org/Diskussion:Informationsdienst_gegen_Rechtsextremismus
Wish you a lot of fun retracing the evolutionary history of the lemma. I haven't got the nerve for never ending debates with Slim about obviously evident facts, please see the history and discussion of David Icke and the "doubts" concerning ayahuasca. Will give you a better understanding bout slims "approach". Thanks for attention and goodbye. Foreigner 07:32, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- Foreigner, if you want to edit the English Misplaced Pages, you have to edit in accordance with our policies. We need sources for any contentious edits. See WP:V and WP:NOR. SlimVirgin 07:38, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- The sources are all given. See above and proof it if you are able to read german. Foreigner
- But, alas!, I'll give you a original source which is also quoted in the German Article, please see
- Kritik am IDGR von Claus Wolfschlag, einem Publizisten der Neuen Rechten
- But, alas!, I'll give you a original source which is also quoted in the German Article, please see
- in translation it means roughly speaking
- criticism concerning the IDGR by Claus Wolfschlag, a publicist who is conciderd to be New Right
- We need them in this article, not in the German one. Please review our content policies. SlimVirgin 07:48, 24 May 2006 (UTC)