Misplaced Pages

:Child protection: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:32, 6 April 2013 view sourceAlison (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators47,243 edits rv: that means something very different, and that's unacceptable. Also, stop being so shrill with the claims of impending doom← Previous edit Revision as of 20:52, 6 April 2013 view source Tom harrison (talk | contribs)Administrators47,534 editsm See also: link title Commons:Commons:Child protection|Wikimedia Commons: Child protectionNext edit →
Line 29: Line 29:
* ] * ]
* ] (essay, rejected proposal) * ] (essay, rejected proposal)
* ] * ]


{{Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines}} {{Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines}}

Revision as of 20:52, 6 April 2013

Not to be confused with Child protection. This policy is about the behaviour and actions of adult editors with regards to children. For the policy regarding the content of articles related to living people, including children, see Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living people.
This page documents a Misplaced Pages policy with legal considerations.Shortcuts
Legal policies

Misplaced Pages regards the safety of children using the site as a key issue. Editors who attempt to use Misplaced Pages to pursue or facilitate inappropriate adult–child relationships, who advocate inappropriate adult–child relationships on or off-wiki (e.g. by expressing the view that inappropriate relationships are not harmful to children), or who identify themselves as pedophiles, will be blocked indefinitely.

Reports of editors engaging in such conduct should be made to the Arbitration Committee for further action, and should not be the subject of community discussion, requests for comment or consensus.

Any administrator may block an editor for the conduct described in this policy. When an editor is blocked for such conduct, the blocking administrator is instructed to use neutral block summaries, and disable the editor's ability to edit their talk page as well as their access to the on-site user email interface. Blocking administrators should inform the blocked editor that any appeals or further discussion may be addressed only to the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-appeals-en@lists.wikimedia.org, and then notify the Committee immediately.

Comments posted on Misplaced Pages suggesting that an editor may be a pedophile will be RevDeleted promptly, to avoid issues of privacy and possible libel. You should raise your concerns only by email; questions or accusations directed against a particular editor in project space may result in a block for the editor who posted them.

If you are a younger editor and feel that another person on Misplaced Pages is behaving in a way that you feel threatens your personal safety, or worries you in any way whatsoever, please tell a responsible adult, and ask them to look at this page. Do not continue to communicate with the other person – ignore them completely. Never give out personal information to anyone, including people who say they are trying to help you.

If you are concerned about the behavior of another editor, please contact Misplaced Pages's Arbitration Committee at arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org, but please read the Communications and privacy section of the Arbitration Committee page before doing so.

See also

Misplaced Pages key policies and guidelines (?)
Content (?)
P
G
Conduct (?)
P
G
Deletion (?)
P
Enforcement (?)
P
Editing (?)
P
G
Style
Classification
Project content (?)
G
WMF (?)
P
Categories: