| Revision as of 01:27, 9 April 2013 editWtshymanski (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users76,118 edits rv← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:56, 9 April 2013 edit undoGuy Macon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers59,287 edits →April 3013: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| I noticed you reverted my edits to ] could find no source for the exsistance of a single bladed turbine, even the linked article only mentons it in passing. As for the numbers %6 and %3, again there is no source, do you think you could find a source for both of these problems? Otherwise I don't beleve this material belongs on wikipeida. A place for this discussion might be . ] (]) 15:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC) | I noticed you reverted my edits to ] could find no source for the exsistance of a single bladed turbine, even the linked article only mentons it in passing. As for the numbers %6 and %3, again there is no source, do you think you could find a source for both of these problems? Otherwise I don't beleve this material belongs on wikipeida. A place for this discussion might be . ] (]) 15:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
| : Well, as you've noticed, single blade designs are not common. I haven't been working a lot on the wind power article lately but wehn I was, I recall that the discussion of blade count vs. efficiency was in line with what I was reading on the theory. --] (]) 16:09, 8 April 2013 (UTC) | : Well, as you've noticed, single blade designs are not common. I haven't been working a lot on the wind power article lately but wehn I was, I recall that the discussion of blade count vs. efficiency was in line with what I was reading on the theory. --] (]) 16:09, 8 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == April 3013 == | |||
| ] Please stop your ]. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did at ], you may be ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete3 --> --] (]) 14:56, 9 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:56, 9 April 2013
This page has been edited. I noticed you reverted my edits to Wind_turbine_design here could find no source for the exsistance of a single bladed turbine, even the linked article only mentons it in passing. As for the numbers %6 and %3, again there is no source, do you think you could find a source for both of these problems? Otherwise I don't beleve this material belongs on wikipeida. A place for this discussion might be here. CombatWombat42 (talk) 15:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- Well, as you've noticed, single blade designs are not common. I haven't been working a lot on the wind power article lately but wehn I was, I recall that the discussion of blade count vs. efficiency was in line with what I was reading on the theory. --Wtshymanski (talk) 16:09, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
April 3013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did at Phase-out of incandescent light bulbs, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. --Guy Macon (talk) 14:56, 9 April 2013 (UTC)