| Revision as of 14:40, 13 April 2013 editDPL bot (talk | contribs)Bots668,805 edits dablink notification message (see the FAQ)← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:21, 15 April 2013 edit undoWtshymanski (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users76,111 edits hose outNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| This page has been edited. | This page has been edited. | ||
| I noticed you reverted my edits to ] could find no source for the exsistance of a single bladed turbine, even the linked article only mentons it in passing. As for the numbers %6 and %3, again there is no source, do you think you could find a source for both of these problems? Otherwise I don't beleve this material belongs on wikipeida. A place for this discussion might be . ] (]) 15:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| : Well, as you've noticed, single blade designs are not common. I haven't been working a lot on the wind power article lately but wehn I was, I recall that the discussion of blade count vs. efficiency was in line with what I was reading on the theory. --] (]) 16:09, 8 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for April 13== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| :] (] | ]) | |||
| ::added a link pointing to ] | |||
| :] (] | ]) | |||
| ::added a link pointing to ] | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 14:40, 13 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:21, 15 April 2013
This page has been edited.