| Revision as of 14:21, 15 April 2013 editWtshymanski (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users76,106 edits hose out← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:41, 16 April 2013 edit undoGuy Macon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers59,287 edits →Talk:Power factor: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| This page has been edited. | This page has been edited. | ||
| == ] == | |||
| I would like to get the page protection lifted from ]. To do that, I am asking you to agree to not use reverts to insert your theory that there is no such thing as a negative power factor into that article without a consensus of the other editors that you are correct. You can just put the word "Agree" in the edit summary when you delete this (signifying that you agree to not insert your theory into the article; I am not asking you to agree that there is such a thing as a negative power factor) Your cooperation would be appreciated. --] (]) 02:41, 16 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:41, 16 April 2013
This page has been edited.
Talk:Power factor
I would like to get the page protection lifted from Power factor. To do that, I am asking you to agree to not use reverts to insert your theory that there is no such thing as a negative power factor into that article without a consensus of the other editors that you are correct. You can just put the word "Agree" in the edit summary when you delete this (signifying that you agree to not insert your theory into the article; I am not asking you to agree that there is such a thing as a negative power factor) Your cooperation would be appreciated. --Guy Macon (talk) 02:41, 16 April 2013 (UTC)