Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Irish republicanism: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 03:53, 18 April 2013 edit70.24.250.103 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:51, 30 January 2014 edit undoHJ Mitchell (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators121,833 edits →Neutral eyes requested: new sectionNext edit →
Line 37:		Line 37:
	==File:DermO'N.jpg==		==File:DermO'N.jpg==
	] has been nominated for deletion -- ] (]) 03:53, 18 April 2013 (UTC)		] has been nominated for deletion -- ] (]) 03:53, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

			== Neutral eyes requested ==

			Hi folks, I'd really appreciate it if any of you could spare the time to take a look over ] and offer some comments at ]. I've recently re-vamped the article and I'm hoping to take it to FAC. I think it's a neutral summary of the available material, but it's a controversial subject, so I'd welcome any good-faith suggestions for improvements. Thanks, ] \| ] 20:51, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:51, 30 January 2014

Shortcut

WT:IR

Irish republicanism NA‑class

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Irish republicanism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Irish republicanism and Irish nationalism related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Irish republicanismWikipedia:WikiProject Irish republicanismTemplate:WikiProject Irish republicanismIrish republicanism
NA	This page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Irish republicanism and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 14 days

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Amendment requested for 'The Troubles' Arbitration remedies; input welcome

Hi all,

Interested editors are invited to review and comment on a request for amendment to the discretionary sanctions remedy (R5) of the The Troubles Arbitration case.

Regards,
Daniel (talk) 04:15, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Arbitration motion regarding Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/The Troubles

Resolved by motion at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment that:

Remedy 5 (Standard discretionary sanctions) of Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/The Troubles is amended as follows:

The words "and British baronets" are stricken from this remedy. The Committee reserves the right to restore sanctions to this area by motion, should a pattern of editing problems re-emerge. Existing sanctions which were placed prior to this amendment remain in effect (and unmodified) until they expire or are lifted via the normal appeals process.

For the Arbitration Committee, --Guerillero | My Talk 20:01, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Discuss this

Erin gobragh

Can somebeody answer here?

http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Erin_go_bragh#United_Ireland — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.3.76.133 (talk) 11:00, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

File:DermO'N.jpg

File:DermO'N.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 70.24.250.103 (talk) 03:53, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Neutral eyes requested

Hi folks, I'd really appreciate it if any of you could spare the time to take a look over Operation Flavius and offer some comments at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Operation Flavius. I've recently re-vamped the article and I'm hoping to take it to FAC. I think it's a neutral summary of the available material, but it's a controversial subject, so I'd welcome any good-faith suggestions for improvements. Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:51, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Categories: