Misplaced Pages

Talk:Suicide of Kelly Yeomans: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:18, 19 April 2013 editBorn2cycle (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers31,496 edits Requested move: +Comment← Previous edit Revision as of 19:40, 19 April 2013 edit undoTimtrent (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers131,418 edits Reverted good faith edits by Born2cycle (talk): No. It has been closed as withdrawn. If you want to raise it again you can not just revert the closure. Take it elsewhere. ([[WP:TW...Next edit →
Line 14: Line 14:
== Requested move == == Requested move ==


<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top -->
{{requested move/dated|multiple=yes
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of a ]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a ]. No further edits should be made to this section. ''
|current1=Suicide of Kelly Yeomans|new1=Kelly Yeomans|current2=Suicide of Dawn-Marie Wesley|new2=Dawn-Marie Wesley|current3=Suicide of Nicola Ann Raphael|new3=Nicola Ann Raphael|current4=Suicide of Ryan Halligan|new4=Ryan Halligan|current5=Suicide of Megan Meier|new5=Megan Meier|current6=Suicide of Tyler Clementi|new6=Tyler Clementi|current7=Suicide of Phoebe Prince|new7=Phoebe Prince|current8=Suicide of Jamey Rodemeyer|new8=Jamey Rodemeyer|current9=Suicide of Audrie Pott|new9=Audrie Pott|current10=Suicide of Rehtaeh Parsons|new10=Rehtaeh Parsons|current11=Suicide of Amanda Todd|new11=Amanda Todd|}}

The result of the move request was: '''Withdrawn''' by nominator. ] (]) 18:25, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

----


* ] → {{no redirect|Kelly Yeomans}} * ] → {{no redirect|Kelly Yeomans}}
Line 37: Line 41:
*'''Leave it alone'''. T13, you've been reminded elsewhere to focus on constructive editing of Article space. This is not helping. Perhaps somebody uninvolved can invoke ] if T13 doesn't self-withdraw this in good time. —] (]) 17:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC) *'''Leave it alone'''. T13, you've been reminded elsewhere to focus on constructive editing of Article space. This is not helping. Perhaps somebody uninvolved can invoke ] if T13 doesn't self-withdraw this in good time. —] (]) 17:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
** I've already suggested above that I'm not opposed to withdrawing the request; however, I would like to understand it better. I've taken some time to skim over a few of these articles, and most of them now have "something" named after them and some even have legislation named after them. That being the case, how are the people now not notable? ] (]) 18:20, 18 April 2013 (UTC) ** I've already suggested above that I'm not opposed to withdrawing the request; however, I would like to understand it better. I've taken some time to skim over a few of these articles, and most of them now have "something" named after them and some even have legislation named after them. That being the case, how are the people now not notable? ] (]) 18:20, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a ]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a ]. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->
*'''Comment'''. I just reverted the very early close of this discussion. I, for one, think the proposal deserves further discussion, at the very least. Consensus may have changed on this issue. --]2] 19:18, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:40, 19 April 2013

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 17 March 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconDerbyshire Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThe article on Suicide of Kelly Yeomans is supported by the Derbyshire WikiProject, which is a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of Derbyshire-related articles on Misplaced Pages.DerbyshireWikipedia:WikiProject DerbyshireTemplate:WikiProject DerbyshireDerbyshire
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
More information:
Note icon
This article needs at least one photograph to be added
Note icon
This article does not require a map
Note icon
This article needs to have an infobox added
Note icon
This article needs statistical information to be added
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconBiography
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconDeath: Suicide Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article is supported by the Suicide task force (assessed as Mid-importance).


Untitled

Added a referance and removed no sources tag. (Neostinker 19:18, 3 September 2006 (UTC))

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Withdrawn by nominator. George Ho (talk) 18:25, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


– A discussion on my talk page got me wondering if these articles fail WP:CRIME, as the victim would not independently be notable? I'm pretty sure that if the sources are available, and the person had something dedicated in their name, then that may qualify for notability. However, unless there is a valid reason to disambiguate these articles, they should be just the persons name, as the WP:PRECISION section of WP:TITLE suggests. Technical 13 (talk) 15:27, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

  • Speedy oppose - This is a humongous multi-move on something so simple (or complex). I suggest that you withdraw this request and then raise this in WP:VPP. --George Ho (talk) 16:27, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Absolutely, categorically not. Speedy close Such articles are not biographies. There have been many such discussions over time, and all discussions have been closed in favour of the title Suicide of Foo for very good reasons: the people are not of themselves notable. Their death is notable. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:37, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Oppose. These are notable suicides, not notable individuals (and it's a similar situation with most "Murder of . . ." articles). The wording here sums it up well enough. Rivertorch (talk) 17:16, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
    • I have no problem withdrawing my proposal at this time. There are just so many forums and this seemed like to be the one that fit the best. Should I raise my issues (details here) on WP:VPP as George suggests, on WP:VPR, on WP:N, or someplace else? They all have redirect pages from "foo" to "suicide of foo", WP:PRECISION says if there is no conflict of names, and the name is available, it should be just "foo". Why would these incidents be notable but the people that the incident is about not be? Perhaps a new section needs to be added to the general notability section that protects these "suicide of ..." and "murder of ..." articles as being notable because the incident was notable. I have no problem leaving the redirects from the "suicide of ..." pages to the persons article. I'm all about discussion and consensus on this, which is why I proposed the move instead of just being WP:BOLD and moving things. Technical 13 (talk) 17:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
      • Because notability is not inherited; a person doesn't become notable (in the sense of requiring their own separate biographical article) because they were involved in a notable incident, even one so intimately connected to them as this. Events can be notable, but if the people involved in them aren't notable in their own right, there's no sense in automatically judging them to require a whole new article which will mostly be a duplicate of the event's article, since they're not notable for anything else. This is all in policy already (in things like WP:1E or WP:CRIME); I don't think any changes are necessary, really.
  • Oppose, per my comment above (and others' comments, too) Writ Keeper  17:24, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Leave it alone. T13, you've been reminded elsewhere to focus on constructive editing of Article space. This is not helping. Perhaps somebody uninvolved can invoke WP:SNOW if T13 doesn't self-withdraw this in good time. —Sladen (talk) 17:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
    • I've already suggested above that I'm not opposed to withdrawing the request; however, I would like to understand it better. I've taken some time to skim over a few of these articles, and most of them now have "something" named after them and some even have legislation named after them. That being the case, how are the people now not notable? Technical 13 (talk) 18:20, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Categories: