Revision as of 20:17, 23 April 2013 editRgambord (talk | contribs)427 edits →Article ban← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:58, 23 April 2013 edit undoSlp1 (talk | contribs)Administrators27,803 edits commentNext edit → | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Per the article probation conditions laid out ], you are banned from participation on ] and it's associated talk page for six months. Refactoring or altering the comments of others you are in a dispute with and deleting entire sections of an ongoing discussion on a talk page are disruptive. In the future, when you feel there is a violation of ] to address, feel free to take the issue up to myself or another uninvolved administrator.--v/r - ]] 20:05, 23 April 2013 (UTC) | Per the article probation conditions laid out ], you are banned from participation on ] and it's associated talk page for six months. Refactoring or altering the comments of others you are in a dispute with and deleting entire sections of an ongoing discussion on a talk page are disruptive. In the future, when you feel there is a violation of ] to address, feel free to take the issue up to myself or another uninvolved administrator.--v/r - ]] 20:05, 23 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
:I'm leaving anyways. You have had a part in this by allowing a hostile atmosphere to exist. Calling someone a terrorist is apparently ok, as long as it's a feminist saying it. Fuck wikipedia. ] (]) 20:17, 23 April 2013 (UTC) out | :I'm leaving anyways. You have had a part in this by allowing a hostile atmosphere to exist. Calling someone a terrorist is apparently ok, as long as it's a feminist saying it. Fuck wikipedia. ] (]) 20:17, 23 April 2013 (UTC) out | ||
::Rgambord, I just wanted to comment quickly on one aspect of today's editing. I see that I was mistaken to restore 2 of the 3 sections. I did not see that yesterday when you said that you had merged some talkpage sections that you didn't actually merge them, but instead duplicated the material into other sections. And then you deleted the original sections today. I'm not exactly sure why you did this "merge" in two stages a day apart, but I am sorry for making the mistake of not to look further back in the article history to see the details of your previous actions. On the other hand, though a minor issue, deleting this section rather than archiving it, wasn't really in keeping with ]. But as I said, I am sorry for the mistake on my part. ] (]) 21:58, 23 April 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:58, 23 April 2013
Article ban
Per the article probation conditions laid out Talk:Men's_rights_movement/Article_probation, you are banned from participation on Men's rights movement and it's associated talk page for six months. Refactoring or altering the comments of others you are in a dispute with and deleting entire sections of an ongoing discussion on a talk page are disruptive. In the future, when you feel there is a violation of WP:BDP to address, feel free to take the issue up to myself or another uninvolved administrator.--v/r - TP 20:05, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
- I'm leaving anyways. You have had a part in this by allowing a hostile atmosphere to exist. Calling someone a terrorist is apparently ok, as long as it's a feminist saying it. Fuck wikipedia. Rgambord (talk) 20:17, 23 April 2013 (UTC) out
- Rgambord, I just wanted to comment quickly on one aspect of today's editing. I see that I was mistaken to restore 2 of the 3 sections. I did not see that yesterday when you said that you had merged some talkpage sections that you didn't actually merge them, but instead duplicated the material into other sections. And then you deleted the original sections today. I'm not exactly sure why you did this "merge" in two stages a day apart, but I am sorry for making the mistake of not to look further back in the article history to see the details of your previous actions. On the other hand, though a minor issue, deleting this section rather than archiving it, wasn't really in keeping with WP:TPG. But as I said, I am sorry for the mistake on my part. Slp1 (talk) 21:58, 23 April 2013 (UTC)