| Revision as of 12:06, 25 April 2013 editJtalledo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers28,600 edits ←Created page with '==Jean-Philippe Guillemin== There was a merge request on this article. It was uncontested, so it was merged and redirect into Zenwalk. So redirecting it was ...' | Revision as of 12:24, 25 April 2013 edit undoH1p3ri0n (talk | contribs)47 edits →Jean-Philippe GuilleminNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Jean-Philippe Guillemin== | ==Jean-Philippe Guillemin== | ||
| There was a merge request on this article. It was uncontested, so it was merged and redirect into ]. So redirecting it was '''not''' vandalism. And considering your username and edit history, I think you have a ]. --] ] 12:06, 25 April 2013 (UTC) | There was a merge request on this article. It was uncontested, so it was merged and redirect into ]. So redirecting it was '''not''' vandalism. And considering your username and edit history, I think you have a ]. --] ] 12:06, 25 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ** The article was created by a contributor who thought it was legitimate to document the work of JP Guillemin in several domains, computer programming, music. This redirection restrict this work to only one domain, which is not correct. The article is a stub, not really finished but deserves to be there, and to be improved, not redirected. The statement that everything of the original article is present in #Zenwalk is false. You know what? I'm tired of this :) | |||
Revision as of 12:24, 25 April 2013
Jean-Philippe Guillemin
There was a merge request on this article. It was uncontested, so it was merged and redirect into Zenwalk. So redirecting it was not vandalism. And considering your username and edit history, I think you have a conflict of interest. --Jtalledo (talk) 12:06, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
- The article was created by a contributor who thought it was legitimate to document the work of JP Guillemin in several domains, computer programming, music. This redirection restrict this work to only one domain, which is not correct. The article is a stub, not really finished but deserves to be there, and to be improved, not redirected. The statement that everything of the original article is present in #Zenwalk is false. You know what? I'm tired of this :)