| Revision as of 10:05, 4 May 2013 editAniMate (talk | contribs)15,188 edits →Appeal of article ban: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:43, 4 May 2013 edit undoUseTheCommandLine (talk | contribs)Rollbackers3,618 edits →A friendly suggestionNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| I am not telling you what to do or how to go about your business, but simply suggesting that it may be worth your while to read up about what you appear to want to get involved in. -- <span style="font-family:monospace"> ] ~/] ] # <span style="background-color:black">_</span> </span> 08:05, 4 May 2013 (UTC) | I am not telling you what to do or how to go about your business, but simply suggesting that it may be worth your while to read up about what you appear to want to get involved in. -- <span style="font-family:monospace"> ] ~/] ] # <span style="background-color:black">_</span> </span> 08:05, 4 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :You're not doing much to impress me upon your return. I had hoped for some community action, not more strife. In the time I've spent responding to your various noticeboard posts, and the time you spent crafting them, you and I could have easily fleshed out ]. Instead, it sits in a most disagreeable state. ''So it goes.'' ] (]) 08:41, 4 May 2013 (UTC) | :You're not doing much to impress me upon your return. I had hoped for some community action, not more strife. In the time I've spent responding to your various noticeboard posts, and the time you spent crafting them, you and I could have easily fleshed out ]. Instead, it sits in a most disagreeable state. ''So it goes.'' ] (]) 08:41, 4 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ::In my experience, and of course yours may be different, editing is not nearly so easy. One of the first articles I worked on is ]. I only worked on the medical section. I started last summer, intending it simply as a review of the published evidence and WP content, hoping to comply with ] and ideally, use Open Access articles as much as possible. | |||
| ::I am still not finished, nearly a year later. -- <span style="font-family:monospace"> ] ~/] ] # <span style="background-color:black">_</span> </span> 10:43, 4 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Undo == | == Undo == | ||
Revision as of 10:43, 4 May 2013
Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
Hello, Rgambord. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- # _ 01:38, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Male privilege and its relation to Men's rights movement
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- # _ 04:30, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
A friendly suggestion
You may want to read up a bit on ArbCom before throwing your proverbial hat into the ring. You are of course welcome to do so either way.
The only reason I placed notifications here on your talk page is because I mentioned your name in the two noticeboard filings I made, at NPOVN and ANI. I am required to place those notices by mentioning your name on these noticeboards, despite the fact that these issues are, or at least were, historical and by what I interpret most administrators' standards to be, stale.
I am not telling you what to do or how to go about your business, but simply suggesting that it may be worth your while to read up about what you appear to want to get involved in. -- # _ 08:05, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- You're not doing much to impress me upon your return. I had hoped for some community action, not more strife. In the time I've spent responding to your various noticeboard posts, and the time you spent crafting them, you and I could have easily fleshed out Male Privilege. Instead, it sits in a most disagreeable state. So it goes. Rgambord (talk) 08:41, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- In my experience, and of course yours may be different, editing is not nearly so easy. One of the first articles I worked on is Aspirin. I only worked on the medical section. I started last summer, intending it simply as a review of the published evidence and WP content, hoping to comply with WP:MEDRS and ideally, use Open Access articles as much as possible.
- I am still not finished, nearly a year later. -- # _ 10:43, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Undo
You need to self-revert here. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 09:21, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Appeal of article ban
You need to go to WP:Arbitration enforcement to appeal the article ban you're currently under. They have instructions there for appeals. AniMate 10:05, 4 May 2013 (UTC)