Misplaced Pages

David Berger (historian): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:41, 28 May 2006 editShlomke (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,145 edits Conflict over Rabbi Ahron Soloveitchik's letters: Link with source← Previous edit Revision as of 04:51, 28 May 2006 edit undoShlomke (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,145 edits David Singer's critique and Berger's response: Expand Criticism (pasted from Chabad article)Next edit →
Line 35: Line 35:
Since Rabbi Soloveitchik never himself discredited the veracity of the 1996 letter, suspicions of forgery remain speculative. Since Rabbi Soloveitchik never himself discredited the veracity of the 1996 letter, suspicions of forgery remain speculative.


===Criticism===
===David Singer's critique and Berger's response===
], Director of Research for the ], wrote a lengthy criticism of Berger at ], stating, among other things, that Berger has "emerged as a would-be ] on the Orthodox scene, demanding a policy of 'intolerance' and 'exclusion' toward those he deems to be heretical to Orthodoxy."<ref name=singer>Singer, David, , OrthodoxyToday.org, accessed March 15, 2006.</ref>. Berger responded at length on the same website.<ref name=berger>Berger, David, , OrthodoxyToday.org, accessed March 15, 2006.</ref> ], Director of Research for the ], wrote a lengthy criticism of Berger at ], stating, among other things, that Berger has "emerged as a would-be ] on the Orthodox scene, demanding a policy of 'intolerance' and 'exclusion' toward those he deems to be heretical to Orthodoxy."<ref name=singer>Singer, David, , OrthodoxyToday.org, accessed March 15, 2006.</ref>. Berger responded at length on the same website.<ref name=berger>Berger, David, , OrthodoxyToday.org, accessed March 15, 2006.</ref>

Likewise, Professor ], chairman of the department of Jewish philosophy at Hebrew University, strongly disputes Berger's claims that new Chabad teachings amount to heresy; however he does not believe that such beliefs are correct. In regards to those who wait for Schneerson to return from the dead as a messiah, Ravitzky stated "Torah does not prohibit a person from being stupid."


==See also== ==See also==

Revision as of 04:51, 28 May 2006

For the victim of the Munich massacre, see David Mark Berger.
Berger's most famous work

Rabbi Dr. David Berger is a professor of history at Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, and a visiting professor at Yeshiva University's Bernard Revel Graduate School. He is most famous for advocating a purge of messianist Chabad-Lubavitch ideology from Orthodox Judaism.

Education

Berger received a bachelor's degree from Yeshiva College in 1964. He then went on to Columbia University where he completed a Master of Arts degree in 1965 and his doctor of philosophy in 1970. He received rabbinic ordination from the Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary and is a member of the Rabbinical Council of America, the official organization representing Modern Orthodox rabbis.

Criticism of Chabad-Lubavitch messianism

Summary

Berger, an academic expert on Jewish responses to Christianity, particularly claims of Jesus messiahship and divinity, criticized what he viewed as similar assertions made by some religious leaders of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement about their last Rebbe Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson shortly after Rabbi Schneerson's death in 1994. Berger claimed that such assertions could not be squared with traditional Jewish texts. An example of Berger's prooftexts is the passage in the Talmud which shows that Rabbi Akiva set aside his previous assertions of Simon bar Kokhba's presumed messiahship following Bar Kokhba being put to death. To Berger, Chabad's viewpoint on this issue is outside the pale of accepted Orthodox Jewish belief. Berger has been highly disappointed by the Orthodox establishment's reaction to Chabad-Lubavitch's claims that Schneerson is the Jewish messiah, arguing that there is a "scandal of Orthodox indifference".

Support

Berger states that his views are shared and supported by many prominent Orthodox authorities, including leaders from the Ashkenazi non-Hasidic Lithuanian (Litvak) institutions, Ponevezh yeshiva in Bnei Brak, Israel, especially the reactions and statements of its late Rosh yeshiva ("dean") Rabbi Elazar Shach (see Elazar Shach: Opposition to the Lubavitcher Rebbe) and the vehement opposition of the Rabbinical Seminary of America (Yeshivas Chofetz Chaim) in New York.

Rabbi Aharon Feldman, the dean of the non-Hasidic Yeshiva Ner Yisrael: Ner Israel Rabbinical College in Baltimore, Maryland, wrote a widely-disseminated letter in 2004 which stated that Orthodox Jews should avoid praying in Chabad synagogues that avowed a belief in the Rebbe as the Messiah. He stated that while there is nothing in Jewish law against the messianist views of Chabad-Lubavitch, they "dig under the foundations of Torah fundamentals" and any support of them should be avoided.

Berger is a highly popular figure in Modern Orthodox circles. Following Yeshiva University President Rabbi Norman Lamm's announcement that he would retire in 2001, Berger placed second on an online poll which asked who Lamm's successor should be. In 1996, largely at his behest, the Rabbinical Council of America, the largest organization of Modern Orthodox rabbis in the United States, approved the following resolution:

"In light of disturbing developments which have recently arisen in the Jewish community,the Rabbinical Council of America in convention assembled declares that there is not and has never been a place in Judaism for the belief that Mashiach ben David will begin his Messianic mission only to experience death, burial, and resurrection before completing it."

Berger felt that the RCA resolution was a very significant turning point for his cause, as he recounts in his book that after the resolution was approved, "the thunder-bolt struck."

Conflict over Rabbi Ahron Soloveitchik's letters

A letter was subsequently published as a paid advertisement in 1996 in The Jewish Press, a widely circulated Jewish newspaper, signed by Rabbi Ahron Soloveitchik, the late rosh yeshiva of Yeshivas Brisk of Chicago and Yeshiva University, condemning the resolution. The letter stated that:

"The belief held by many in Lubavitch... that the Rebbe can still be Moshiach... cannot be dismissed as a belief that is outside the pale of Orthodoxy. Any cynical attempt at utilizing a legitimate disagreement of interpretation concerning this matter, to besmirch and damage the Lubavitch movement... can only contribute to the regrettable discord that already plagues the Jewish and particularly Torah community."

Despite this, many believe that the letter was actually a forgery, especially in light of Rabbi Soloveitchik's clarification of his own position two years earlier in an article in The Forward, another Jewish publication, in which he states that to believe that the Rebbe is still the Messiah is indeed outside the pale of Orthodoxy:

"The late Rebbe can't be the Messiah -- he is not living -- a Messiah has to be living -- a living Messiah, not a dead Messiah."

Since Rabbi Soloveitchik never himself discredited the veracity of the 1996 letter, suspicions of forgery remain speculative.

Criticism

David Singer, Director of Research for the American Jewish Committee, wrote a lengthy criticism of Berger at OrthodoxyToday.org, stating, among other things, that Berger has "emerged as a would-be Torquemada on the Orthodox scene, demanding a policy of 'intolerance' and 'exclusion' toward those he deems to be heretical to Orthodoxy.". Berger responded at length on the same website.

Likewise, Professor Aviezer Ravitzky, chairman of the department of Jewish philosophy at Hebrew University, strongly disputes Berger's claims that new Chabad teachings amount to heresy; however he does not believe that such beliefs are correct. In regards to those who wait for Schneerson to return from the dead as a messiah, Ravitzky stated "Torah does not prohibit a person from being stupid."

See also

Notes

  1. Singer, David, "The Rebbe, the Messiah, and the Heresy Hunter", OrthodoxyToday.org, accessed March 15, 2006.
  2. Berger, David, "Response to David Singer", OrthodoxyToday.org, accessed March 15, 2006.

Works

  • Berger, David. The Rebbe, the Messiah, and the Scandal of Orthodox Indifference, Littman Library of Jewish Civilization, 2001 (ISBN 1874774889)

External links

Categories: