| Revision as of 07:21, 17 May 2013 editNeotarf (talk | contribs)4,029 edits discretionary sanctions postponements← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:54, 17 May 2013 edit undoNeotarf (talk | contribs)4,029 edits linking to political meaning of "kick the can"Next edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| **The notifications in March, for instance , said "The request is archived; however, an arbitrator is planning on offering an arbitrator motion 'very shortly'", but as far as I know, this has not been done. —] (]) 16:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC) | **The notifications in March, for instance , said "The request is archived; however, an arbitrator is planning on offering an arbitrator motion 'very shortly'", but as far as I know, this has not been done. —] (]) 16:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ***By a happy coincidence, the follow-up to that clarification request was scheduled some time ago to take place this week. However, the original clarification surely does not belong in this week's arbitration report, given how stale it now is. ] ]] 21:48, 16 May 2013 (UTC) | ***By a happy coincidence, the follow-up to that clarification request was scheduled some time ago to take place this week. However, the original clarification surely does not belong in this week's arbitration report, given how stale it now is. ] ]] 21:48, 16 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ****Not sure how happy it is, or how arb-staleness is measured, but I have noticed that anything with a discretionary sanctions component seems to be getting kicked down the road these days. —] (]) 07:21, 17 May 2013 (UTC) | ****Not sure how happy it is, or how arb-staleness is measured, but I have noticed that anything with a discretionary sanctions component seems to be getting ] down the road these days. —] (]) 07:21, 17 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 07:54, 17 May 2013
← Back to Arbitration report
Discuss this story
- Under "other actions", the last item links to a clarification request that ended in March – two months ago. AGK 15:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- The notifications in March, for instance here, said "The request is archived; however, an arbitrator is planning on offering an arbitrator motion 'very shortly'", but as far as I know, this has not been done. —Neotarf (talk) 16:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- By a happy coincidence, the follow-up to that clarification request was scheduled some time ago to take place this week. However, the original clarification surely does not belong in this week's arbitration report, given how stale it now is. AGK 21:48, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Not sure how happy it is, or how arb-staleness is measured, but I have noticed that anything with a discretionary sanctions component seems to be getting kicked down the road these days. —Neotarf (talk) 07:21, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- By a happy coincidence, the follow-up to that clarification request was scheduled some time ago to take place this week. However, the original clarification surely does not belong in this week's arbitration report, given how stale it now is. AGK 21:48, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- The notifications in March, for instance here, said "The request is archived; however, an arbitrator is planning on offering an arbitrator motion 'very shortly'", but as far as I know, this has not been done. —Neotarf (talk) 16:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC)