| Revision as of 06:46, 31 May 2013 editMiszaBot II (talk | contribs)259,776 editsm Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 15d) to Misplaced Pages talk:Neutral point of view/FAQ/Archive 2.← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:37, 31 July 2013 edit undoCarolmooredc (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,944 edits →RE: Calling "attention to the problem publicly": update and clarify questionNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| == RE: Calling "attention to the problem publicly" == | == RE: Calling "attention to the problem publicly" == | ||
| ] reads ''Unless the case is really egregious, maybe the best thing is to call attention to the problem publicly, pointing the perpetrators to this page...(etc)'' | |||
| As described at ]. When I see something like this it means to me the first step is: discuss at the talk page per ], start a new section on biased editing, quote the policy and then list strong evidence, especially quoting very biased ] by individual(s). Obviously as politely as possible (which I intend to do ''next'' time) - but if I am totally misinterpreting this, do tell. First time I tried it a new editor who sees every correction as a ''personal attack'' went postal so of course it makes me a bit nervous in doing it again. Thanks. ''] - <small>]</small><big>🗽</big> 15:46, 30 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| This it means to me the first step is: discuss at the talk page per ], even start a new section on biased editing if necessary, quote the policy and list evidence of bias, like explicit biased statements by the editor. However, some editors will complain of personal attacks if you do it just once, not to mention if you need to do it again in that or another article. So any guidance on whether having to do it repeatedly because of ] is a problem. ''] - <small>]</small><big>🗽</big> 15:46, 30 May 2013 (UTC)'' | |||
Revision as of 13:37, 31 July 2013
 Archives | ||
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
RE: Calling "attention to the problem publicly"
Misplaced Pages:Neutral_point_of_view/FAQ#Dealing_with_biased_contributors reads Unless the case is really egregious, maybe the best thing is to call attention to the problem publicly, pointing the perpetrators to this page...(etc)
This it means to me the first step is: discuss at the talk page per WP:Dispute, even start a new section on biased editing if necessary, quote the policy and list evidence of bias, like explicit biased statements by the editor. However, some editors will complain of personal attacks if you do it just once, not to mention if you need to do it again in that or another article. So any guidance on whether having to do it repeatedly because of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT is a problem. CarolMooreDC - talkie talkie🗽 15:46, 30 May 2013 (UTC)