| Revision as of 21:35, 5 June 2013 editBeerest355 (talk | contribs)2,512 edits →OK, so...: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:12, 6 June 2013 edit undoVanished87817173 (talk | contribs)803 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| ::Preferably. Even something like a commented out section (< !-- text -->, without the space) would be nice. That way it only shows up in the page's source code and not on the page itself. <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 17:24, 5 June 2013 (UTC) | ::Preferably. Even something like a commented out section (< !-- text -->, without the space) would be nice. That way it only shows up in the page's source code and not on the page itself. <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 17:24, 5 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :::Ok. --] (]) 17:28, 5 June 2013 (UTC) | :::Ok. --] (]) 17:28, 5 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == June 2013 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 21:08, 5 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == OK, so... == | |||
| Have you learned not to change "Fall" to anything else? Every time it seems I try to correct you, you simply change it anyway, and attempts to contact you are useless. I'm just trying to reach a consensus here. ] <small>]</small> 21:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:12, 6 June 2013
|
April 2013
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Xbox 720. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 22:31, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 22:50, 30 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
GSK ● ✉ ✓ 22:50, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Archcaster, you are invited to the Teahouse
|
Hi Archcaster! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. |
Acknowledgement
Thanks for the acknowledgement of appreciation for the edit. :) AmericanDad86 (talk) 20:35, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
- Your Welcome. --Archcaster (talk) 15:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
User page
I'm happy that you like my user page so much that you decided to copy it, but I'd appreciate some attribution since this design has taken me a long time to perfect. Thanks. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 17:05, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
- Your Welcome and yes I like your user page. Thanks to you, I figured out how to put a background on my user page. Also, when you mean by "attribution", do you mean that you want me to credit you for the design?--Archcaster (talk) 17:23, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
- Preferably. Even something like a commented out section (< !-- text -->, without the space) would be nice. That way it only shows up in the page's source code and not on the page itself. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 17:24, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
- Ok. --Archcaster (talk) 17:28, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
- Preferably. Even something like a commented out section (< !-- text -->, without the space) would be nice. That way it only shows up in the page's source code and not on the page itself. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 17:24, 5 June 2013 (UTC)