| Revision as of 04:41, 30 May 2006 editAlmost Famous (talk | contribs)158 edits This dipshit wants to be an administrator? Fuck that.← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:49, 30 May 2006 edit undoWes! (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers1,644 edits disclaimer/wikifyNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {| class="infobox" width="315px" | {| class="infobox" width="315px" | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
| # | # | ||
| |}<!--Template:Archivebox--> | |}<!--Template:Archivebox--> | ||
| <center>'''Please note:''' This page is not censored. It may contain personal attacks as a result of the work I do with vandalism reverts. That being said, I welcome your comments, whatever their nature.</center> | |||
| ==VandalProof== | ==VandalProof== | ||
| Line 41: | Line 42: | ||
| :I'll take another look at the revision, I seemed to see a number of spelling errors and apparent ] issues on quick glance. Mostly, it seemed like a jumbled and hurried edit, perhaps a <nowiki>{{test}}</nowiki> warning should've been used. The second revision you made is fine. In the future, make sure to use the preview button to check for errors before you save changes. Happy editing, ]]] • ]] 06:02, 29 May 2006 (UTC) | :I'll take another look at the revision, I seemed to see a number of spelling errors and apparent ] issues on quick glance. Mostly, it seemed like a jumbled and hurried edit, perhaps a <nowiki>{{test}}</nowiki> warning should've been used. The second revision you made is fine. In the future, make sure to use the preview button to check for errors before you save changes. Happy editing, ]]] • ]] 06:02, 29 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==Almost Famous== | |||
| You are NOT and administrator, and therefore you have no right to restore anything on MY talk page. You have no RIGHT to WARN me. This is MY WARNING TO YOU! STAY THE FUCK AWAY! ] 04:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:49, 30 May 2006
 Archives |
|---|
VandalProof
Hi, I'm sorry to hear you can't log into VP. There appears to be a problem with the programme at the moment, with regards to moderating the User List, which three moderators have had within the last 24 hours. It may have something to do with that, or may have something to do with you being previously an apporved user and we may need to delete your previous account to get this one to work, but we can't do anything currently as the moderator tools aren't working.
So basically once I know any more I'll let you know, but we are working on it. If you've got any more questions leave me a message. --Wisden17 14:54, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- Alright, thanks for letting me know. Please contact me once these issues have been resolved. Wes! • c 17:41, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- Good news and bad news. Good news now know what the problem is, bad news will take a little while to resolve! AmiDaniel replied to a question I left and to quote "Oh, and for User:Wes!, the exclamation point is what's causing the problem--User:That Guy, From That Show! had a similar problem. The bug is now fixed in the next version (to be released this weekend)."
- So you'll have to wait a few days before you can use it. Blame it on the exclamation point!!! --Wisden17 20:09, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- I figured so much. The excitement will always get you. Of course, if that darned username usurption process would get figured out, I would've taken User:Wes. Oh well. Thanks for the help, I'll assume it's fixed once 1.2 is released. Wes! • c 20:27, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- Hi, yeah if you have any more problems after 1.2 is realeased I'd advise getting in contact with AmiDaniel, as I can't really help on that matter, as I'm not au fait with the source code. --Wisden17 18:31, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- I figured so much. The excitement will always get you. Of course, if that darned username usurption process would get figured out, I would've taken User:Wes. Oh well. Thanks for the help, I'll assume it's fixed once 1.2 is released. Wes! • c 20:27, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- So you'll have to wait a few days before you can use it. Blame it on the exclamation point!!! --Wisden17 20:09, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Vincent van Gogh
I've noticed you've reverted some vandalism on this article, so I thought I'd draw your attention to this proposal on the talk page. Tyrenius 01:43, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks!
I wear my userpage vandals like stripes on a letterman's jacket. :) --Zpb52 06:42, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Vandal
You are nothing more than a high school VANDAL -- leave other user pages alone and mind your business. Almost Famous 17:47, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- It is against Misplaced Pages policy to allow blanking of one's talk page. You asked for an archive in this edit and I happily obliged per WP:BOLD. I have no vandalism in my record; if you believe an edit of mine could be considered vandalism, I'd prefer you to bring it to my attention before resorting to personal attacks. Wes! • c 23:06, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Pro-choice
I'm unsure about what content was lost in my version but DO NOT believe that the word ethical should be included. Besides that Alienus' version has some spelling errors, and seems to be a little biased. I did revert back to my version (with some changes) and would be glad to help out fix the information. Chooserr 05:56, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- I'll take another look at the revision, I seemed to see a number of spelling errors and apparent NPOV issues on quick glance. Mostly, it seemed like a jumbled and hurried edit, perhaps a {{test}} warning should've been used. The second revision you made is fine. In the future, make sure to use the preview button to check for errors before you save changes. Happy editing, Wes! • c 06:02, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Almost Famous
You are NOT and administrator, and therefore you have no right to restore anything on MY talk page. You have no RIGHT to WARN me. This is MY WARNING TO YOU! STAY THE FUCK AWAY! Almost Famous 04:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC)