| Revision as of 05:43, 16 June 2013 editDoniago (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers113,285 edits →Confused: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:59, 17 June 2013 edit undoBlackmane (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,617 edits →Confused: replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| Can you please explain why my ANI filing was closed as a ''content'' dispute when, IMO, I did everything possible to make it clear that my concerns were regarding an editor's ''conduct'' (i.e. their personal attacks directed towards me) rather than the underlying issues regarding the article? I would be happy to open a ] case per your recommendation, but I don't see how I have the grounds to do so since the content-related issues at ] appear to be being handled okay; the issue, as I noted at ANI, is ]'s blatant failures to AGF and incivility despite having been blocked for exactly this type of conduct previously. Their conduct towards me is, IMO, disruptive and inappropriate for that page, and is making it very difficult for me to engage in the discussion. Thank you for clarifying this for me. ] (]) 05:43, 16 June 2013 (UTC) | Can you please explain why my ANI filing was closed as a ''content'' dispute when, IMO, I did everything possible to make it clear that my concerns were regarding an editor's ''conduct'' (i.e. their personal attacks directed towards me) rather than the underlying issues regarding the article? I would be happy to open a ] case per your recommendation, but I don't see how I have the grounds to do so since the content-related issues at ] appear to be being handled okay; the issue, as I noted at ANI, is ]'s blatant failures to AGF and incivility despite having been blocked for exactly this type of conduct previously. Their conduct towards me is, IMO, disruptive and inappropriate for that page, and is making it very difficult for me to engage in the discussion. Thank you for clarifying this for me. ] (]) 05:43, 16 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :I closed it based on the lack of admin input over the several days that your ANI filing was open, the only one being Kudpung who made a recommendation that the dispute be taken to DRN. Generally, ANI posts that last for more than 3 days with little admin input are usually just left to flounder until it is archived, or the behaviour of the participants ''in'' the ANI causes the admins to step in. | |||
| That being said, yes, the discussion got heated on the talk page and there was some ABF and incivility, but rather than fight the ''symptoms'' of the heated debate I made the move to close the ANI and direct you to DRN with the aim of dealing with the ''cause'', I hope I read Kudpung's intention correctly there. If DRN can provide a compromise, then perhaps it can be resolved to the satisfaction of both yourself and AmericanDad86. Admins tend to be very leary of civility blocks where there is no obvious pattern or history of chronic misbehaviour and the heated debate on the talk page definitely did not rise to the level of disruption that would normally lead to a block. You've been around WP as an editor much longer than I have so I won't patronise you on how the politics tend to work here. I hope that clarified things for you, but please feel free to drop another message if you have anything else. ] (]) 08:59, 17 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:59, 17 June 2013
Hello, Blackmane, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
- Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. You can also contact me if you wish by clicking "talk" to the right of my name. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:52, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Confused
Can you please explain why my ANI filing was closed as a content dispute when, IMO, I did everything possible to make it clear that my concerns were regarding an editor's conduct (i.e. their personal attacks directed towards me) rather than the underlying issues regarding the article? I would be happy to open a WP:DRN case per your recommendation, but I don't see how I have the grounds to do so since the content-related issues at Talk:American Dad! appear to be being handled okay; the issue, as I noted at ANI, is User:AmericanDad86's blatant failures to AGF and incivility despite having been blocked for exactly this type of conduct previously. Their conduct towards me is, IMO, disruptive and inappropriate for that page, and is making it very difficult for me to engage in the discussion. Thank you for clarifying this for me. Doniago (talk) 05:43, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- I closed it based on the lack of admin input over the several days that your ANI filing was open, the only one being Kudpung who made a recommendation that the dispute be taken to DRN. Generally, ANI posts that last for more than 3 days with little admin input are usually just left to flounder until it is archived, or the behaviour of the participants in the ANI causes the admins to step in.
That being said, yes, the discussion got heated on the talk page and there was some ABF and incivility, but rather than fight the symptoms of the heated debate I made the move to close the ANI and direct you to DRN with the aim of dealing with the cause, I hope I read Kudpung's intention correctly there. If DRN can provide a compromise, then perhaps it can be resolved to the satisfaction of both yourself and AmericanDad86. Admins tend to be very leary of civility blocks where there is no obvious pattern or history of chronic misbehaviour and the heated debate on the talk page definitely did not rise to the level of disruption that would normally lead to a block. You've been around WP as an editor much longer than I have so I won't patronise you on how the politics tend to work here. I hope that clarified things for you, but please feel free to drop another message if you have anything else. Blackmane (talk) 08:59, 17 June 2013 (UTC)