Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''{{Break}}See ]<!-- Template:uw-ew -->
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''{{Break}}See ]<!-- Template:uw-ew --><small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 07:17, 25 June 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
I told you to not open this thread! You probably don't listen to your mommy too, right?
Blocked for combative editing and personal attacks
Your first article edit after making a series of sarcastic comments and personal attacks at AN/I was to go back to reverting – without good explanation, and without providing your own supporting sources – edits made by Nickyp88, under the assertion (without discussion) that they were 'original research': . This was the original issue which started the thread at AN/I in the first place, and you should well have known that simply returning to the original edit war was not acceptable.
Yeah, well, the whole internet (I will not disclose my reliable source until tomorrow since you probably won't even read this) supports my claim and disprove the user's speculation. Actually my intentions were good, you asserted something else... I hope everyone is happy now, especially the kid. I couldn't care less, though. See you tomorrow. ItsAlwaysLupus (talk) 16:15, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Caution
While I have no objection to you doing constructive work on your talk page during your block, you are strongly advised to avoid continuing the conduct which led to your original block.
Referring to Nickyp88 – or any other editor – as "the kid" after being warned not to do so is not appropriate. It is also a violation of Misplaced Pages policy to accuse other editors of libel. Misuse of your talk page in this manner will lead to both an extension of the current block, and a withdrawl of your editing privileges on this talk page. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 22:10, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
It's nice that you completely ignored the main thing whereas cherry-picking "incidental" words as you like. This is completely unacceptable and I feel somewhat threatened and ridiculed. ItsAlwaysLupus (talk) 17:39, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
If you're looking to have a conversation, then you shouldn't box up the discussion; it hides your comments. If you have concerns about the way I've handled your case, you are welcome to raise a complaint at WP:AN/I. I would strongly urge you to reflect on your own conduct, however, as I don't believe that any such complaint would be sustained.
Speaking for myself, I feel threatened when an editor accuses me of libel; I would imagine that other editors feel ridiculed when you call them condescending names. What you have been subjected to, on the other hand, is clear and specific criticism of your conduct, including explicit description of how and where it has fallen short of Misplaced Pages's policies and standards; you have also been clearly warned what consequences would apply should you fail to remedy your conduct. Recently, you were blocked because you failed to heed those clear warnings, and in so doing you made Misplaced Pages a hostile and unpleasant place for other volunteers.
If you don't want to have any further replies from me to this thread, that is your choice. I won't make any further comments here as long as this thread remains boxed up; I just don't want to leave any passers-by with the impression that I am unable to respond to your concerns or unwilling to have my actions subjected to scrutiny. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 19:25, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
It might sound plausible, yet it doesn't explain the step of being expelled from Misplaced Pages. This unrelated revert triggered the expulsion yet it doesn't have anything to do with AN/I and I will prove it on your talk page. It was a hasty action to block someone just because he rightfully reverted the disruptive edits of one user who previously has partaken in multiple disputes over the same thing - genres in the infobox. I find it quite ironic that no one seemed to notice that these exaggerated responses are clearly-obviously-not-to-be-taken-seriously which some unrelated users reduced to "vicious personal attacks/borderline threatening". This was used as an excuse to make the final step. Also it's quite shocking that AN/I is treated like pub where everyone can influence others' opinions. ItsAlwaysLupus (talk) 20:13, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
There's no need to split the conversation into two parts; I have your talk page watchlisted. Please keep the threaded discussion here.
I believe that your interpretation is entirely mistaken, and that my actions were taken in accord with normal Misplaced Pages policies and practices. Frankly, you enjoyed more leeway than most administrators might have offered you. The fact that you still don't recognize that your comments – before or after your block – were belittling and condescending is worrying.
Regarding the content dispute you were involved in, I don't know what (sub-)genre Kylie Minogue or any other (nu-)disco artist might be categorized into. The problem with your edit there was not whether it was arguably factually correct, but that your edit was a revert of another editor
in an area where you has previously been involved in edit warring;
with whom you were involved in a current conflict;
on a topic where you were involved in an AN/I discussion;
made without recourse to the article talk page;
made without adding any suitable references or sources to the article, its talk page, or even in the edit summary in support of your revert.
As to the "plebs" (your wording, from my talk page) on AN/I—they're all volunteers, just like you or me. They are as entitled as any Misplaced Pages participant to help determine the course of this project, and to offer their input on how it should be administered. The input of neutral, uninvolved third parties is generally held to be a useful and potent tool for defusing and (if necessary) deciding disputes. More often than not, the editors who offer comments and input at venues like AN/I have years of experience and thousands of edits behind them. Your casual dismissal of of that process, that experience, and that input is regrettable.
As I've noted above, if you wish to seek a review of my administrative actions, you may do so at WP:AN/I, or through a request for comment. I would discourage you from doing so only because perceived misuse of those venues for frivolous, vexatious, or otherwise ill-judged complaints tends to result in uncomfortable scrutiny of the complainant. I am quite willing to respect the judgement of our peers.
I don't think there's any further benefit to my continued participation in this conversation, if it is simply going to be a reiteration of your mistaken belief that your conduct was civil and appropriate. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 02:16, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Legolas2186 replied to my message. It seems the Oricon chart you'd like to add to the article is based on CD sales alone, and it is one component of the Japan Hot 100, which also includes information about radio airplay. Since the Japan Hot 100 includes the Oricon data, only the Japan Hot 100 is shown in the article.
As far as WP:GOODCHARTS goes, look at the fourth and fifth columns. Do you see how Oricon is only listed under the fourth column (Sales), while the Japan Hot 100 spans the fourth and fifth columns (Sales and Airplay)? Legolas2186 says that charts that span multiple columns—such as the Japan Hot 100—are preferred over the charts that fall in only one column, and I think that makes sense. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk19:46, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I somewhat see that Oricon is redundant now (since the Oricon data is used by Japan Hot 100). His clarified response sounds plausible to me and I feel relieved now. Once again, thank you. ItsAlwaysLupus (talk) 20:57, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Evelyn king - the artist's face.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Evelyn king - the artist's face.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 05:32, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello ItsAlwaysLupus! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.
Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.
You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey
Yes but MTV UK is equally reliable and it was there since the beginning. I was not trying to be rude when you told me to mind that ..something. That;'s why i told you that i have been here for long enough to know what to write or not. With all the GAs i have promoted, i don't work like like a robot or for the sake of having a big number of GAs. I also learn form my mistakes. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 04:57, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Tell me then, does it sound reliable to you?
"As soon as we heard this track, it screamed 'classic disco', making us want to chuck on our dancing shoes & hit the floor"
MTV UK is a commercially known product but it doesn't make it more reliable. In fact, their reviews are biased and often contain tongue-in-cheek humor. That's why I challenged you to provide better sources, which you did provide... so I guess everything is "cool" now. ItsAlwaysLupus (talk) 17:30, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
I know you are not a fan (do not love the song that much) because of the edit you were making. Excuse me for my honesty. I am a big fan. I am a fan of anything Beyonce does. Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 17:54, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Haha, no, that's not the reason. There are much worse songs than this. I noticed that ridiculous MTV UK source on Misplaced Pages after I saw the music video on VH1. You sure are! I don't listen to her but Katy Perry and Mariah Carey (you listen to them too, don't you?) are okay. ItsAlwaysLupus (talk) 18:14, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
I listen to all three. I like how Katy has evolved from the s**t she used to be to a woman who now knows that she is married and knows that she can sell her songs without using sex as a means. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 18:32, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Well, you are somewhat right, she is acting "mature" now, but she used to be really funny. Especially the songs and music videos like "Waking Up in Vegas" and "Hot n cold". I can't simply relate to her pretentious "T.G.I.F." or "E.T". . It really misses her carefree persona. Wow, I didn't know that she is married. ItsAlwaysLupus (talk) 19:09, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
★*★*★*★*★*★*★*★* Merry Christmas And Happy New Year 2012 *★*★*★*★*★*★*★*★
I Wish You And Your Family A Merry Christmas And A Happy New Year 2012. May The New Year Bring Much Happiness, Prosperity, Peace, And Success In Your Life. I Am Very Happy To be Part of Misplaced Pages And To Have Great Friends Like You. Cheers.
Hi. When you recently edited Dance-rock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blondie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:15, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Darryl Payne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carol Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. When you recently edited Fred Zarr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Out of the Blue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yin Yang Yo!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Bowen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I am sorry, It's just that Frederator did not Co-Produce with Jetix on Yin Yang Yo, the reason Why I Did this is beacuse Mundi's World did not exist although it's a Rumor, plus Fred Seibert didn't work on Yin Tang Yo, if you google Yin Yang You 7 click on the wikipedia page. You'll see that Fred Seubert did not do it. plus Frederator Studios did not creaed Mundi's World, it was actully an Unknown person. Thanks for understanding! - Annoymous — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.92.42.82 (talk) 20:21, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
The problem with claims such as "plus Frederator Studios did not creaed Mundi's World" lies in the lack of additional references or simple proof to back it up. You need to understand that Misplaced Pages primarily relies on trusted third-party references and verifiable claims which you unfortunately didn't provide any (except subjective speculations of yours which aren't welcomed even on a Z-grade fan-based blog catering to tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorists). The "Mundi's world" line was heavily maintained by Mexico-based Anonymous user 201.160.131.251/189.220.19.117 so feel free to contact them (him/her) directly. ItsAlwaysLupus (talk) 17:27, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Japanese-Jewish Common Ancestor Theory
I quoted several passages from that source in two separate block quotes separate by a single short sentence, so I think it as visually difficult to distinguish between the quote and my text.
At any rate, I have added italics and expanded the sentence between the block quotes. I hope that addresses your concerns. gather that since the non-neutral phrasing you pointed out is part of the source quote that there are no POV issues. If I am missing something there, please let me know.
I have noticed some large blue quotation marks people use to set off block quotes, but don't see them readily available on the page. I should copy and paste them next time I run across them and undo the italics.--Ubikwit (talk) 19:00, 3 December 2012 (UTC)Ubikwit
Terminology.
Will move your remarks to the section in the Disco article talk page discussing this topic and reply to you there. Edkollin (talk) 03:19, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
nemzeti mozgalmak célja, módszerei és eredményei. (in Hungarian). Magyar Fórum, 1995/9, 22. old.)</ref>.
that Hungarians in Slovakia are actually overprivileged.<ref name="Sharipol">{{Cite book |title=>Politics Without a Past: The Absence of History in Postcommunist Nationalism|last=Cohen |first=
A tag has been placed on a page you created requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit ] to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Yopie (talk) 03:30, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Please be aware that the topic of Anti-Hungarian sentiment falls in the domain of the WP:ARBEE arbitration case. Any effort by you to recreate a free-standing article on this topic by edit warring is unlikely to have good results. See WP:AC/DS for the sanctions which apply. User:Malik Shabazz has suggested a WP:Deletion review as one way you might get consensus to recreate such an article. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 04:13, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Anti-Hungarian sentiment. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
— 
Hello, I'm 
which appears inside of the speedy deletion (
