Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/Misplaced Pages proposals: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:31, 3 July 2013 editRFC bot (talk | contribs)216,124 edits Removed: Misplaced Pages:Reference desk/Refdesk reform RFC.← Previous edit Revision as of 17:01, 5 July 2013 edit undoRFC bot (talk | contribs)216,124 edits Added: Misplaced Pages talk:Naming conventions (Vietnamese).Next edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
'''The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:''' '''The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:'''
</noinclude> </noinclude>
''']'''
{{rfcquote|text=
(Q1) should ] be returned from ] to ] until it has gone through a consensus editing, proposal and adoption process? (Q2) if the answer to Q1 is '''yes''' then Q2 should the {draft} banner be restored, or alternatively replaced with the {historical} banner? ] (]) 16:50, 5 July 2013 (UTC)}}
''']''' ''']'''
{{rfcquote|text= {{rfcquote|text=

Revision as of 17:01, 5 July 2013

The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:

Misplaced Pages talk:Naming conventions (Vietnamese)

(Q1) should Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions (Vietnamese) be returned from Category:Misplaced Pages naming conventions to Category:Misplaced Pages naming conventions proposals until it has gone through a consensus editing, proposal and adoption process? (Q2) if the answer to Q1 is yes then Q2 should the {draft} banner be restored, or alternatively replaced with the {historical} banner? In ictu oculi (talk) 16:50, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Main Page

Per the above thread, it is proposed that the link to Wikinews in the "In the News" section be removed. 20:01, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Village pump (proposals)

Currently, there are about 200 indefinite rangeblocks on various IPs, most of which are non-required now. A previous proposal on this Village Pump, which sought to remove these old rangeblocks under controlled conditions passed successfully. This proposal is to finalize all the various details on that proposal, and to carry forward with it.

TheOriginalSoni (talk) 06:37, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment

Proposed, to add a section to the page Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment, the section to be titled "RfC on main page items" and the content to consist of the sentence "Publication of a main page item (such as 'today's featured article') is suspended while a valid RfC on the item is open".

The intent and probable effect of this addition is twofold:

  1. To establish, by clear inference, that RfC on main page items are indeed permitted and operative.
  2. To specify how main page items are to be handled in these cases.

Survey

  • Neutral Oppose. Herostratus' wall-of-text below has convinced me that RfCs and DYK noms are very different types of discussion, so his suspending one discussion to open another wasn't (or shouldn't have been) as counter-productive as it first appeared to me. That said, I don't think it's an ideal situation, and shouldn't be explicitly endorsed by the guidelines (per WP:BEANS). And given that, as far as I'm aware, there's only ever been one such RfC in the history of Misplaced Pages, the proposed rule doesn't seem necessary at this point. These RfCs ought to be sufficiently rare that the validity of each can be discussed individually. So, in short, I'm voting for status quo – RfCs on main page items should be neither explicitly allowed nor forbidden.DoctorKubla (talk) 07:27, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/The bot flag

How should we handle inactive bots and keep bots on Misplaced Pages more organised. Started: 10:20 6 June 2013 UTC ·addshore· 10:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC)


Requests for comment (All)
Articles (All)
Non-articles (All)
InstructionsTo add a discussion to this list:
  • Add the tag {{rfc|xxx}} at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, {{rfc|xxx|yyy}}, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.
For more information, see Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment. Report problems to Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment. Lists are updated every hour by Legobot.