Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Vladlena Funk: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:20, 4 July 2013 editChaetodipus (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers14,725 edits Listing at WP:DELSORT under Russia (FWDS)← Previous edit Revision as of 03:35, 11 July 2013 edit undoDusti (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers24,412 edits Relisting debateNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}


:{{la|Vladlena Funk}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) :{{la|Vladlena Funk}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>)
:({{Find sources|Vladlena Funk}}) :({{Find sources|Vladlena Funk}})
None of the ] third-party sources, of which there are rather few in the first place, mention the subject at all. Google News shows a few passing mentions in relation to a bizarre abduction to Belarus, but no significant coverage - at best ] applies. Besides the general lack of notability, the article has severe problems with ], ] and ]. ] had told me of the article and said that there were others of the same "quality"; it may be worthwhile to go looking for them. I'll also notify ]. ] (]) 04:00, 4 July 2013 (UTC) None of the ] third-party sources, of which there are rather few in the first place, mention the subject at all. Google News shows a few passing mentions in relation to a bizarre abduction to Belarus, but no significant coverage - at best ] applies. Besides the general lack of notability, the article has severe problems with ], ] and ]. ] had told me of the article and said that there were others of the same "quality"; it may be worthwhile to go looking for them. I'll also notify ]. ] (]) 04:00, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Line 8: Line 8:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. —]]] 05:20, 4 July 2013 (UTC)</small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. —]]] 05:20, 4 July 2013 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. —]]] 05:20, 4 July 2013 (UTC)</small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. —]]] 05:20, 4 July 2013 (UTC)</small>
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <font face="Segoe script">]]</font> 03:35, 11 July 2013 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->]
<hr style="width:55%;" />

Revision as of 03:35, 11 July 2013

Vladlena Funk

Vladlena Funk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the reliable third-party sources, of which there are rather few in the first place, mention the subject at all. Google News shows a few passing mentions in relation to a bizarre abduction to Belarus, but no significant coverage - at best WP:BLP1E applies. Besides the general lack of notability, the article has severe problems with WP:OR, WP:NPOV and WP:BLP. ImmortalPanda had told me of the article and said that there were others of the same "quality"; it may be worthwhile to go looking for them. I'll also notify WT:WikiProject Belarus. Huon (talk) 04:00, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 05:20, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 05:20, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 05:20, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti 03:35, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Categories: