Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Sexual apartheid: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:06, 1 June 2006 editGerry Lynch (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,525 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 18:56, 1 June 2006 edit undoPecher (talk | contribs)6,453 edits []: commentNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
* '''Delete'''. Unencyclopedic neologism. --] ] 14:33, 1 June 2006 (UTC) * '''Delete'''. Unencyclopedic neologism. --] ] 14:33, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep and expand'''. Term coined by Paul Hoch in 1972. According to it is in fairly wide use in academic and other circles. shows 17,100 results. --] 15:15, 1 June 2006 (UTC) *'''Keep and expand'''. Term coined by Paul Hoch in 1972. According to it is in fairly wide use in academic and other circles. shows 17,100 results. --] 15:15, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
:''Reductio ad Googlum'' is the weakest argument possible. In fact, Google Books search does not establish the notability of the term or its meaning; extensive research using reliable sources is required to do either. The books where this phrase is found may use in various meaning, and Google search certainly says nothing as to how widely the term is accepted or whether there is any agreement regarding its meaning. ] <sup>]</sup> 18:56, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per everyone above. Just someone trying to prove a ]. -- ] 15:17, 1 June 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per everyone above. Just someone trying to prove a ]. -- ] 15:17, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
* '''Delete'''. Homeontherange obviously created this term so that he could justify creating a obviously pov disambiguation page.- ] | ] 15:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC) * '''Delete'''. Homeontherange obviously created this term so that he could justify creating a obviously pov disambiguation page.- ] | ] 15:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:56, 1 June 2006

Sexual apartheid

Yes, it's Another Apartheid Afd. However, unlike Israeli apartheid, this one doesn't look at all like a widespread term. It says "Sexual Apartheid is a term used by some same-sex rights advocates", but the references don't back this up, as the three external links all refer to Peter Tatchell. So if this article was rewritten to fit its sources, it would say "Sexual Apartheid is a term that Peter Tatchell used a couple of times", and having articles on every political catchphrase under the sun would be unnecessary forking. Delete. Sam Blanning 12:24, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Reductio ad Googlum is the weakest argument possible. In fact, Google Books search does not establish the notability of the term or its meaning; extensive research using reliable sources is required to do either. The books where this phrase is found may use in various meaning, and Google search certainly says nothing as to how widely the term is accepted or whether there is any agreement regarding its meaning. Pecher 18:56, 1 June 2006 (UTC)