| Revision as of 18:35, 1 June 2006 editCanadianCaesar (talk | contribs)18,694 edits k← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:37, 1 June 2006 edit undoFormeruser-82 (talk | contribs)15,744 edits Zeq has nominated and also "voted" creating the impression of a double vote.Next edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| POV Fork used in an effort to disrupt wikipedia to make a ] ] 12:41, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | POV Fork used in an effort to disrupt wikipedia to make a ] ] 12:41, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Delete''' - this is POV fork for many articles on this subject already in wikipedia. The only reason for this and several "apartheid" articles created by {{3RRV|Homeontherange}} was to have the Dismabiguation page in which {{3RRV|Homeontherange}} can highlight the term "Israeli apartheid" in bold and hide the South Africa era. All is part of an elborate scheme to make a ] (while disrupting wkipedia) and turn wikipedia to what it is ]. ] 12:36, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | * '''Delete''' - this is POV fork for many articles on this subject already in wikipedia. The only reason for this and several "apartheid" articles created by {{3RRV|Homeontherange}} was to have the Dismabiguation page in which {{3RRV|Homeontherange}} can highlight the term "Israeli apartheid" in bold and hide the South Africa era. All is part of an elborate scheme to make a ] (while disrupting wkipedia) and turn wikipedia to what it is ]. ] 12:36, 1 June 2006 (UTC)<small>Zeq is also the nominator, his "vote" should only be counted once) | ||
| * '''Delete''' Not sure about the motives of the article's author, but the spurious creation of several articles with "apartheid" in their title does smack of ]. The article does not provide any sources discussing the ''notability'' of the term; therefore, it will be original research to conclude that the term is notable based on several sources using it. ] <sup>]</sup> 14:00, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | * '''Delete''' Not sure about the motives of the article's author, but the spurious creation of several articles with "apartheid" in their title does smack of ]. The article does not provide any sources discussing the ''notability'' of the term; therefore, it will be original research to conclude that the term is notable based on several sources using it. ] <sup>]</sup> 14:00, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep'''. Term coined by Gernot Köhler in the 1970s and subject of an OUP book ''Global Apartheid: Refugees, Racism and the New World Order'' by Anthony H. Richmond (ISBN 0195410130). According to the term is used widely in academic circles and shows 79,500 results. --] 15:03, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. Term coined by Gernot Köhler in the 1970s and subject of an OUP book ''Global Apartheid: Refugees, Racism and the New World Order'' by Anthony H. Richmond (ISBN 0195410130). According to the term is used widely in academic circles and shows 79,500 results. --] 15:03, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:37, 1 June 2006
Global apartheid
POV Fork used in an effort to disrupt wikipedia to make a WP:Point Zeq 12:41, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - this is POV fork for many articles on this subject already in wikipedia. The only reason for this and several "apartheid" articles created by Homeontherange (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) was to have the Dismabiguation page in which Homeontherange (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) can highlight the term "Israeli apartheid" in bold and hide the South Africa era. All is part of an elborate scheme to make a WP:Point (while disrupting wkipedia) and turn wikipedia to what it is not. Zeq 12:36, 1 June 2006 (UTC)Zeq is also the nominator, his "vote" should only be counted once)
- Delete Not sure about the motives of the article's author, but the spurious creation of several articles with "apartheid" in their title does smack of WP:POINT. The article does not provide any sources discussing the notability of the term; therefore, it will be original research to conclude that the term is notable based on several sources using it. Pecher 14:00, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Term coined by Gernot Köhler in the 1970s and subject of an OUP book Global Apartheid: Refugees, Racism and the New World Order by Anthony H. Richmond (ISBN 0195410130). According to Google Books the term is used widely in academic circles and Google shows 79,500 results. --Ian Pitchford 15:03, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe a "global apartheid(book)" in the =see also= section of apartheid.... Zeq 15:08, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Zeq and Pecher. -- Kicking222 15:17, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Homeontherange obviously created this term so that he could justify creating a obviously pov disambiguation page.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 15:23, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, per MCHAS and Zeq. -- Heptor talk 15:50, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Weak delete due to sudden creation of all these apartheid articles. Xyrael 16:12, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- keep phrase recieves many hits and is being used by activists and academics. Mover doesn't like term "Israeli apartheid" so has decided to attack other articles to prove a point. Homey 16:39, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. As above. Jayjg 17:24, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - no value RenyD 17:35, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Ian Pitchford. CanadianCaesar Cæsar is turn’d to hear 18:35, 1 June 2006 (UTC)