Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
::Immediately after returning to Misplaced Pages from his 24-hour suspension for reverting an article eight times in under 24 hours, ] deleted all of the language from the article that four out of five editors agreed was notable and verifiable. He dishonestly titled his as ''Restore consensus version''. This is poor sportsmanship at its worst. -- ] 19:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
::Immediately after returning to Misplaced Pages from his 24-hour suspension for reverting an article eight times in under 24 hours, ] deleted all of the language from the article that four out of five editors agreed was notable and verifiable. He dishonestly titled his as ''Restore consensus version''. This is poor sportsmanship at its worst. -- ] 19:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
== Blocked ==
{| class="user-block"
|| ]
|| You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
|}<!-- Template:3RR5 --> ] (]) 21:59, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Revision as of 21:59, 1 June 2006
Henry M. Jackson
Hi. User:FRCP11 has request action be taken with regard to a violation of the Three revert rule. That rule states that a user shall not revert an edit 3 times during a twenty-four hour period, otherwise they shall be liable to be blocked. I've reviewed your edits to this page and there do appear to be 3 or more reverts to the same text in 24hours, meaning you have compromised the 3RR. Since the edits were from yesterday, I am leaving this warning on your talk page to draw your attention to the rule, rather than blocking your account. Please consider the rule and discuss edits on the talk page rather than reverting edits you do not agree with. Kcordina10:06, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Immediately after returning to Misplaced Pages from his 24-hour suspension for reverting an article eight times in under 24 hours, User:8bitJake deleted all of the language from the article that four out of five editors agreed was notable and verifiable. He dishonestly titled his reversion as Restore consensus version. This is poor sportsmanship at its worst. -- FRCP1119:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Blocked
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
