Revision as of 17:40, 5 June 2006 editGiovanni33 (talk | contribs)10,138 edits →Request← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:41, 5 June 2006 edit undoGiovanni33 (talk | contribs)10,138 edits →Censorhip at SV's talk pageNext edit → | ||
Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
My response, copied from his page: Hello, nice meeting you. I belong to ] - though now ] is a part of ]. I have seen most of the areas of Bihar, one day I shall give you a list. Yes, Please wrtie about all the places of Bihar - I will look into them from time to time. In case, you have picture, please upload them too. All the best! --] 14:26, 5 June 2006 (UTC) | My response, copied from his page: Hello, nice meeting you. I belong to ] - though now ] is a part of ]. I have seen most of the areas of Bihar, one day I shall give you a list. Yes, Please wrtie about all the places of Bihar - I will look into them from time to time. In case, you have picture, please upload them too. All the best! --] 14:26, 5 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
== |
==Censorship at SV's talk page== | ||
Hi. Since you said you agree with my comment that POV's should not be silenced at SV's talk page, I want to bring this to your attention. I responded to your comment below, but it was removed as it involved my theory which could be construed as negative in nature. I disagree but fine. So, I placed another message, below, and even this one is being removed. I feel this is blatant and unjust censorship and ask you to help in restoring it, since you did say you agreed with me about not silencing others voices on the talk page: | Hi. Since you said you agree with my comment that POV's should not be silenced at SV's talk page, I want to bring this to your attention. I responded to your comment below, but it was removed as it involved my theory which could be construed as negative in nature. I disagree but fine. So, I placed another message, below, and even this one is being removed. I feel this is blatant and unjust censorship and ask you to help in restoring it, since you did say you agreed with me about not silencing others voices on the talk page: |
Revision as of 17:41, 5 June 2006
Magnifico!Your city is deep within my heart. Are you one of St Thomas? LoveMonkey 16:43, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Deep in my heart because of Thomas. LoveMonkey 16:18, 1 June 2006 (UTC) I would like to try to add a mention of your article, to the icon article add the part about Thomas' icon of the mother of God. Since the icon is very old and the tradition behind it dates to 60ad. Thanks Again. Since an attempt has already been rebuffed by Ghirlandajo. I was hoping you might help???? LoveMonkey 11:56, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Fabulous! :) LoveMonkey 18:50, 2 June 2006 (UTC) Sikhism articleHi Bhadani! Rama's Arrow and I (and many other users!, especially Rajatjghai), have been working to make the Sikhism article up to a standard that is worthy of being a FA. Please take a look and make your comments on the talk page before we try and go for FA status. Thanks. Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 15:31, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
The smileThanks for the smile. Jayjg 17:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC) Madam CamaInterested in the portrait of Madam Cama, I would like to reproduce it for a forthcoming publication. Any suggestion? Regards.--BobClive 12:57, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Is it possible to send you the answer by e-mail ?--BobClive 16:48, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello Bhadani, As a Wiki-novice, I confess my ignorance about the access to wiki e-mail addresses. SOS. Thanks.--BobClive 08:38, 3 June 2006 (UTC) Re:QuestionYou to me: Hello. Apart from being a Misplaced Pages administrator, I am also a university student of politology. I would like to ask you, cause you are Indian, what do you think about current anti-reservation debate. On which side do you stand? Thank you. :) - Darwinek 25 May 2006 (UTC)
ThanksThanks for the smile. It really brightened my day!--digital_me 15:34, 2 June 2006 (UTC) smileThanks for the smile. Did anything in particular prompt it? Just curious. -- Rick Block (talk) 17:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the smile. I'll pass it on. :) —Viriditas | Talk 21:43, 2 June 2006 (UTC) A haiku of thanks
-- Natalya 04:58, 3 June 2006 (UTC) You've been truffled by CharlieCharlie has given you some of his famous Solid chocolate truffles! Chocolate truffles taste good, help moods, promote WikiLove and hopefully make your day better. Hope you find the truffles to be tasty, and make sure you enjoy them with a nice tall glass of milk (they're rich)! Wow... 29,000 edits, That's amazing! If wikipedia payed by the edit, you would have a new car or some other close to 30,000$ items by now. But as they don't I feel I should help show our appreciation by giving you some truffles! If you feel like making them for yourself, I have posted the recipe here (For now I'm keeping the rights to the recipe (as I developed it) in a sort of non-commercial, E-mailware type licence). Many Regards and hope you have a good day! --Charlie 05:11, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
ThanksThanks for the wikilove...those always make me happy :) --Osbus 13:45, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
HelpHello Bhadaniji, I saw you welcoming an IP address User talk:210.211.141.45 asking him to open an account on WP. Can you please tell me what is the template that you used for it? I would like to use it for a few other IP addresses. Thanks a lot - Lost 07:45, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
My response: Special:Newpages - this shall "land" you on the newpages, and you may find several "new" things there. Please be careful - oh, no, no, please be bold, I was just joking . --Bhadani 09:35, 4 June 2006 (UTC) My very first award!!!! Thank you so much Bhadaniji!!! Lost 13:22, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks!Thank you Bhadani for the wonderful gift this Sunday afternoon. Nice to hear from you. :) Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 08:52, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
My response copied from his talk page: A user's edit count does not reflect on the value of their contributions to Misplaced Pages! --Bhadani 09:05, 4 June 2006 (UTC) Request for another viewWhen you're wiki-rested, would you take a look at Ram Janmabhoomi, I have been asked to step into this article twice now. It is outside my scope of knowledge and would like another valued pair of eyes (that might at least know something of the subject) before I go into it 'feet first'. There is a smallish section on my talk page about the most recent to-do with it. Hope your break is going well, I know you find it very hard to stay away :) --Alf 09:48, 4 June 2006 (UTC) My response: I am almost wiki-rested! I thank you for giving me an opportunity to have a look in the above article. I would try to do that and let you know of my views. Once I expanded a little Krishnajanmabhoomi. However, I find that all such articles are loaded with a lot of sentiments, and the assignments are really challenging. I am not sure of myself with such pages, but I shall surely try to do something, if I am able to do at all! Regards. --Bhadani 10:15, 4 June 2006 (UTC) SmileThanks for the smile! I did what you asked. Saravask 17:30, 4 June 2006 (UTC) Requesthey,I have very interest to write article on the Darbhanga Goramansingh and Jhanjharpur.I would like to request you that you regularly visit this page and guide me as better as possible. santosh_singh_linux 06:44, June 5 2006 My response, copied from his page: Hello, nice meeting you. I belong to Bihar - though now Ranchi is a part of Jharkhand. I have seen most of the areas of Bihar, one day I shall give you a list. Yes, Please wrtie about all the places of Bihar - I will look into them from time to time. In case, you have picture, please upload them too. All the best! --Bhadani 14:26, 5 June 2006 (UTC) Censorship at SV's talk pageHi. Since you said you agree with my comment that POV's should not be silenced at SV's talk page, I want to bring this to your attention. I responded to your comment below, but it was removed as it involved my theory which could be construed as negative in nature. I disagree but fine. So, I placed another message, below, and even this one is being removed. I feel this is blatant and unjust censorship and ask you to help in restoring it, since you did say you agreed with me about not silencing others voices on the talk page: I stated my view, responding, to your comment below about when I think for sure SV will be back in full action but it was suppressed and reverted. I asked why but there was no answer, just another revert. This underscores the message of this section in regards to silencing any voices, opinions that state a view with commentary that can be interpreted as negative. I don't have any agenda as im not anti or pro SV, but I do have a view on the incident. Its sad that not all views are tolerated, and does make this talk page of limited value as a result. This comment will probably be removed as well per the pattern. If you support my view, Bhandani, I hope you will restore this if and when its removed. Giovanni33 17:21, 5 June 2006 (UTC) Giovanni33 17:36, 5 June 2006 (UTC) |