Misplaced Pages

Talk:Feminism/to do: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Feminism Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:14, 1 September 2013 editCailil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,119 editsm +2← Previous edit Revision as of 02:55, 6 March 2014 edit undo50.184.205.185 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 7: Line 7:
#Summarize ] and integrate. #Summarize ] and integrate.
#Consider the structure and hierarchy of contents with regard to ] #Consider the structure and hierarchy of contents with regard to ]
#Does not include sufficient criticisms and creates a polarized view of feminism.

Revision as of 02:55, 6 March 2014

Improve article to featured standards
  1. The articles citations need attention. All references need to use the {{cite}} template.
  2. 16 citations need specific reference to page numbers.
  3. Section on "Mid-twentieth century" needs work: a) the first paragraph needs to bring together the de Beauvoir material and the second-wave material better; b) it should mention "difference feminism" somehow - it needs to convey that the assumptions underlying second-wave feminism were different than those underlying first-wave feminism.
  4. The "Socialism" subsection does not explain the general impact as well the other two sub-sections. It is too fact-based.
  5. Explanation of "feminisms", as in "multiple feminisms" in the Movements section
  6. Summarize Women's rights and integrate.
  7. Consider the structure and hierarchy of contents with regard to featured standards
  8. Does not include sufficient criticisms and creates a polarized view of feminism.