Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 08:46, 4 September 2013

June 2013

Hello, I'm Faizan. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Faizan 11:44, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Winkelvi. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Battle of Rajasthan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 04:29, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Your inappropriate edits

Please stop adding poorly sourced information (promoting your self-published book??) and removing relevant and sourced information. It is tedious to clean up after you. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:51, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Described in main page.Capitals00 (talk) 03:22, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Again, please stop what you are doing. Remember that Misplaced Pages content has to be based on reliable sources with no original research. If you need help navigating and learning about these policies, the Teahouse is a resource for new users, but I am sure they'd be happy to help you even though you've been around for a while. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:21, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank You, but i have posted the reliable source everytime, who are directly supporting the fact.Capitals00 (talk) 17:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to The Hindu Pantheon, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Have you read WP:NOR? We don't use our own counts like this, you need an independent reliable source. Dougweller (talk) 09:38, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Before welcoming me, have you even read? That how you edited the page. Capitals00 (talk) 09:41, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

I've read WP:NOR, and I've read the article. Dougweller (talk) 09:47, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

You aren't even reading what you have edited, just read once yourself, and the whole article contains the information which has existed in the book itself. Capitals00 (talk) 09:49, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Enjoy them after Iftar. Thanks for removing the POV crap at the article. I was out of the town for a day. Faizan 08:55, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Nehru's religion

Does Nehru's autobiography says anything about his religion?

August 2013

Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Mughal Empire, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Yintan  13:18, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of wars involving India. This contravenes Misplaced Pages's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Yintan  13:22, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Again. Yintan  14:10, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Indo-Pakistani War of 1971

Did you care to read the edit summary of the edit you reverted on this article? --SMS 13:31, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

SMS 14:56, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring at List of wars involving the United States

Hello Capitals00. I've just noticed that you're currently involved in an edit war at List of wars involving the United States. Instead of edit warring, please discuss your edits on the talk page so that you can come to a consensus about what to do. If you keep reverting without discussion, it is quite likely that you will be blocked from editing. I didn't see any previous warnings about edit warring on your talk page, so I'll leave you a standard message below. Please let me know on my talk page if you have any questions about it. Best — Mr. Stradivarius 05:42, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. — Mr. Stradivarius 05:42, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your thanks

) --occono (talk) 16:38, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Notification

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This is a non administrator notification, and will be logged as such on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system. 

You are getting this notification due to your continued editwarring after coming off a block for sockpuppetry. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:49, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013