| Revision as of 21:59, 7 September 2013 view sourceGreyWinterOwl (talk | contribs)845 edits Turning my words into bold is very unpolite, please don't edit my words.← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:05, 29 September 2013 view source John Carter (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users176,670 edits →September 2013: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| : The Brahmin concept of caste style "Pollution" is not a concept we have on the Misplaced Pages. --] (]) 21:24, 7 September 2013 (UTC) | : The Brahmin concept of caste style "Pollution" is not a concept we have on the Misplaced Pages. --] (]) 21:24, 7 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == September 2013 == | |||
| Allow me to be honest here. There is absolutely no reasonable basis for the misuse of article talk pages and violation of ] that are contained in . We do not misuse article talk pages to insult and belittle others, or to indicate without evidence that we are somehow more knowledgable about topics than others, or any number of other things which you seem to do in your recent history of this article. I believe you very much should review talk page guidelines and make a more visible effort to conduct yourself in accord with them, particularly as there is a very real chance that ArbCom involvement will be sought as per the prior ruling. I believe you should regard this as a warning, and, possibly, as the final one you might receive regarding this sort of conduct. Thank you. ] (]) 16:05, 29 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:05, 29 September 2013
I'd like to politely ask you not to stalk me around as per WP:HOUND. Also, as per WP:Talk_page_guidelines, the talk page of an article is meant for discussion about the article, not personal opinions about users. You polluted a clean page of an article: outline_of_chess, with content unrelated to the article, while also ignoring that the users there carry a civilized process of WP:BRD. You could at least use my talk page to speak about me personally. Thank you. GreyWinterOwl (talk) 21:09, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Do you mean this edit where I explained to you why your edits were reverted by others and offered you assistance as to where find help? I never touched Outline of chess.
- The Brahmin concept of caste style "Pollution" is not a concept we have on the Misplaced Pages. --Januarythe18th (talk) 21:24, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
September 2013
Allow me to be honest here. There is absolutely no reasonable basis for the misuse of article talk pages and violation of WP:TPG that are contained in this edit. We do not misuse article talk pages to insult and belittle others, or to indicate without evidence that we are somehow more knowledgable about topics than others, or any number of other things which you seem to do in your recent history of this article. I believe you very much should review talk page guidelines and make a more visible effort to conduct yourself in accord with them, particularly as there is a very real chance that ArbCom involvement will be sought as per the prior ruling. I believe you should regard this as a warning, and, possibly, as the final one you might receive regarding this sort of conduct. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 16:05, 29 September 2013 (UTC)