Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Phoenix and Winslow: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:53, 18 September 2013 editTiptoety (talk | contribs)47,300 edits CU declined← Previous edit Revision as of 05:02, 18 September 2013 edit undoRschen7754 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users123,234 edits Marking case as closedNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:


=====<big>15 September 2013</big>===== =====<big>15 September 2013</big>=====
{{SPI case status|CUdecline}} {{SPI case status|close}}


;Suspected sockpuppets ;Suspected sockpuppets
Line 26: Line 26:
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======
*{{Declined}} - While I agree that {{User|Scoobydunk}} does have a solid grasp on Wiki jargon, I do not see much else that would suggest they are a sock of {{User|Phoenix and Winslow}}. Just because Scoobydunk edited the talk page of an editor who P&W did not get along with does not really justify running a checkuser. Additionally, a CheckUser has already on the connection between P&W and Liangshan Yi saying the connection was {{unlikely}}. Lastly, Liangshan Yi did not show up in my most recent checkuser of P&W. ] <sup>]</sup> 04:53, 18 September 2013 (UTC) *{{Declined}} - While I agree that {{User|Scoobydunk}} does have a solid grasp on Wiki jargon, I do not see much else that would suggest they are a sock of {{User|Phoenix and Winslow}}. Just because Scoobydunk edited the talk page of an editor who P&W did not get along with does not really justify running a checkuser. Additionally, a CheckUser has already on the connection between P&W and Liangshan Yi saying the connection was {{unlikely}}. Lastly, Liangshan Yi did not show up in my most recent checkuser of P&W. ] <sup>]</sup> 04:53, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
*If there's no grounds to justify a CU in this case, there's not really grounds to block the two accounts either. ''']]]''' 05:02, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->

Revision as of 05:02, 18 September 2013

Phoenix and Winslow

Phoenix and Winslow (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Phoenix and Winslow/Archive.



15 September 2013

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets


Goodoldeboy has already been blocked as a sock but doesn't seem to have been reported here so is only included for the record. Comment on P&W's talk page "It should be noted that it appeared you went through some lengths to attempt to avoid detection" probably should also be included for the record. For this reason I am including Liangshan Yi who has already been checked but who has broken a silence of some months to revert removal of a tendentious P&W edit here: . Scoobydunk appears to be a brand new editor whose very first edit was to launch into an article WLRoss (an editor with whom P&W has been feuding for a few years) had been editing; with a suspiciously precocious grasp of WP jargon in the edit summaries and . Daveosaurus (talk) 02:43, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
  • no Declined - While I agree that Scoobydunk (talk · contribs) does have a solid grasp on Wiki jargon, I do not see much else that would suggest they are a sock of Phoenix and Winslow (talk · contribs). Just because Scoobydunk edited the talk page of an editor who P&W did not get along with does not really justify running a checkuser. Additionally, a CheckUser has already commented on the connection between P&W and Liangshan Yi saying the connection was  Unlikely. Lastly, Liangshan Yi did not show up in my most recent checkuser of P&W. Tiptoety 04:53, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
  • If there's no grounds to justify a CU in this case, there's not really grounds to block the two accounts either. Rschen7754 05:02, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Categories: