Misplaced Pages

Template talk:Metro Line: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:11, 27 September 2013 edit117Avenue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers64,480 edits →Template:Metro Line: reply← Previous edit Revision as of 02:15, 29 September 2013 edit undo117Avenue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers64,480 edits →Template:Metro Line: Did you just leave another conversation without garnering consensus for the changes you want to make?Next edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
:Firstly, I do not appreciate being referred to as a “no one”. Just be honest and admit that '''you''' don’t want proposed stations and lines in the route diagrams. Secondly, ''you'' are the source of the St. Albert stations—specifically from 10 September.<br>Your edit summaries indicate that you don’t understand the function of a route diagram, and you didn’t seem to think that ] was of any use ''until'' the links to neighbourhoods were added, so stop being such a hypocrite. ] (]) 01:11, 27 September 2013 (UTC) :Firstly, I do not appreciate being referred to as a “no one”. Just be honest and admit that '''you''' don’t want proposed stations and lines in the route diagrams. Secondly, ''you'' are the source of the St. Albert stations—specifically from 10 September.<br>Your edit summaries indicate that you don’t understand the function of a route diagram, and you didn’t seem to think that ] was of any use ''until'' the links to neighbourhoods were added, so stop being such a hypocrite. ] (]) 01:11, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
::Where or when have you stated you want proposed stations in Edmonton route diagrams? There is a consensus ] and ] to not include this information in the diagrams or images. In that edit I added the identified locations, the table does not say that it is the stations' names. I am removing your references because they do no support your added content. My edit summaries are to encourage discussion (]), something you need to greatly improve upon when you make edits you know are controversial, or appear to be redundant. I don't think I am a hypocrite, I have always wanted a consistent list and navboxes, and to not mislead readers. Is this diagram supposed to be a list of stations? I assume it is, since MacEwan links to MacEwan Station, not the university. It is misleading to make Griesbach linkable also, but have it lead to an article unrelated to public transit. ] (]) 03:11, 27 September 2013 (UTC) ::Where or when have you stated you want proposed stations in Edmonton route diagrams? There is a consensus ] and ] to not include this information in the diagrams or images. In that edit I added the identified locations, the table does not say that it is the stations' names. I am removing your references because they do no support your added content. My edit summaries are to encourage discussion (]), something you need to greatly improve upon when you make edits you know are controversial, or appear to be redundant. I don't think I am a hypocrite, I have always wanted a consistent list and navboxes, and to not mislead readers. Is this diagram supposed to be a list of stations? I assume it is, since MacEwan links to MacEwan Station, not the university. It is misleading to make Griesbach linkable also, but have it lead to an article unrelated to public transit. ] (]) 03:11, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
::Did you just leave another conversation without garnering consensus for the changes you want to make? ] (]) 02:15, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:15, 29 September 2013

WikiProject iconTrains Template‑class
WikiProject icon
Trains Portal
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconCanada: Alberta Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by WikiProject Alberta.
This template was considered for deletion on 10 September 2013. The result of the discussion was "no consensus".

Template:Metro Line

Please revert your changes to Template:Metro Line. Your additions are unreferenced, and no one has stated they want proposed stations and lines in the route diagrams. Thanks, 117Avenue (talk) 03:55, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Firstly, I do not appreciate being referred to as a “no one”. Just be honest and admit that you don’t want proposed stations and lines in the route diagrams. Secondly, you are the source of the St. Albert stations—specifically this edit from 10 September.
Your edit summaries indicate that you don’t understand the function of a route diagram, and you didn’t seem to think that Template:Valley Line (ETS) was of any use until the links to neighbourhoods were added, so stop being such a hypocrite. Useddenim (talk) 01:11, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Where or when have you stated you want proposed stations in Edmonton route diagrams? There is a consensus here and here to not include this information in the diagrams or images. In that edit I added the identified locations, the table does not say that it is the stations' names. I am removing your references because they do no support your added content. My edit summaries are to encourage discussion (WP:BRD), something you need to greatly improve upon when you make edits you know are controversial, or appear to be redundant. I don't think I am a hypocrite, I have always wanted a consistent list and navboxes, and to not mislead readers. Is this diagram supposed to be a list of stations? I assume it is, since MacEwan links to MacEwan Station, not the university. It is misleading to make Griesbach linkable also, but have it lead to an article unrelated to public transit. 117Avenue (talk) 03:11, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Did you just leave another conversation without garnering consensus for the changes you want to make? 117Avenue (talk) 02:15, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Categories: