| Revision as of 13:42, 2 October 2013 editSmsarmad (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers38,409 edits →Familiarize yourself with Arbitration Committee Discretionary Sanctions, please.: tagged sock← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:44, 2 October 2013 edit undoFowler&fowler (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers62,984 edits →Familiarize yourself with Arbitration Committee Discretionary Sanctions, please.: reNext edit → | ||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
| Hi, SMSarmad. I just wanted to remind you that ] may be taken by Arbitration Committee for India-Pakistan related articles. Instead of engaging in revert wars, I suggest that you bring any issues you might have to ]. Adding different points of view with citations or asking for citations for content you personally disagree with is most welcome. I noticed that most, if not all, of your edits on ] are major reverts. It would be great if you added content instead of discouraging other editors from contributing meaningfully. Please familiarize yourself well with ]. :) --] (]) 20:23, 1 October 2013 (UTC) <small>— ] (] • ]) is a ] of ] (] • ]). </small> <small>--] <sup>]</sup> 13:42, 2 October 2013 (UTC)</small> | Hi, SMSarmad. I just wanted to remind you that ] may be taken by Arbitration Committee for India-Pakistan related articles. Instead of engaging in revert wars, I suggest that you bring any issues you might have to ]. Adding different points of view with citations or asking for citations for content you personally disagree with is most welcome. I noticed that most, if not all, of your edits on ] are major reverts. It would be great if you added content instead of discouraging other editors from contributing meaningfully. Please familiarize yourself well with ]. :) --] (]) 20:23, 1 October 2013 (UTC) <small>— ] (] • ]) is a ] of ] (] • ]). </small> <small>--] <sup>]</sup> 13:42, 2 October 2013 (UTC)</small> | ||
| :Obvious sock of peepie/creampie. Wonder were he is editing from so he could avoid CU. ] (]) 07:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC) | :Obvious sock of peepie/creampie. Wonder were he is editing from so he could avoid CU. ] (]) 07:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ::Wow, you guys saw through him pretty quickly! The secret service should be employing you. ]] 16:44, 2 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:44, 2 October 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WELCOME ON MY TALK PAGE! Leave me message·My archive |
 |
HOW'S MY EDITING? |
| Please review me! |
User:Smsarmad/Babel Template:Archive box collapsible
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/MyBank for example
What template do you use to tag confirmed sockpuppets in these discussions? I can't find it in any of the usual spots. Thanks. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 17:04, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- I also tried but couldn't find one so wrote that myself. Now that you have asked for it, I will create one. Will let you know once it is done. --SMS 17:28, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- Here you go: {{Csp}} --SMS 19:47, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- Very awesome. Thank you. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 23:42, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- Here you go: {{Csp}} --SMS 19:47, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Tehwaar Calendars
Hello smsarmad, do not try to Redirect articles as you did in Tehwaar Calendar of Pakistan 2013 and ]. This is your last warning. Enough is enough, if you try once more, then your account will expire on or after 5th October 2013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abcd13.abcd (talk • contribs) 16:29, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- I have already explained the issue on your talk, kindly take a look at it calmly. --SMS 16:40, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
URGENT CONTACT
Dear Mr. SmSarmad
You have made some edits/ changes to an article Javed Malik. We need to update you on a few things as some of the details are not correct and we tried to correct them, and you have UNDONE the edits and restored the old article.
I am not a professional Wiki editor. I am working for Mr. Javed Malik's friend and we are just trying to make the article accurate with some details, and also add an image, but it seems that some wiki editors keep deleting our changes.
We would appreciate if you can please contact me, so that we can make this article with your kind help.
I am not fimiliar with wiki talk pages, etc........ can you please reply by e mail on
SandraRoberts21@gmail.com and can i have your e-mail ID
Many thanks, and waiting for your reply
Sandra — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jameszapper (talk • contribs) 23:18, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
- You've been editing on WP since 2006, and you're still not familiar with talk pages? --| Uncle Milty | talk | 23:27, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Familiarize yourself with Arbitration Committee Discretionary Sanctions, please.
Hi, SMSarmad. I just wanted to remind you that discretionary sanctions may be taken by Arbitration Committee for India-Pakistan related articles. Instead of engaging in revert wars, I suggest that you bring any issues you might have to Talk:Partition of India. Adding different points of view with citations or asking for citations for content you personally disagree with is most welcome. I noticed that most, if not all, of your edits on Partition of India are major reverts. It would be great if you added content instead of discouraging other editors from contributing meaningfully. Please familiarize yourself well with Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/India-Pakistan. :) --Bookishness (talk) 20:23, 1 October 2013 (UTC) — Bookishness (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sockpuppet of Crème3.14159 (talk • contribs). --SMS 13:42, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
- Obvious sock of peepie/creampie. Wonder were he is editing from so he could avoid CU. Darkness Shines (talk) 07:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
- Wow, you guys saw through him pretty quickly! The secret service should be employing you. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 16:44, 2 October 2013 (UTC)