Revision as of 19:41, 2 October 2013 editMjolnirPants (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers8,624 edits →Fix it up: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:44, 5 October 2013 edit undoMjolnirPants (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers8,624 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
I just did a quite edit to better present the info in the article. If anyone can find some sources to back it up, that'd be great )I'm at work, so no time for tracking down primary sources). ] (]) 19:41, 2 October 2013 (UTC) | I just did a quite edit to better present the info in the article. If anyone can find some sources to back it up, that'd be great )I'm at work, so no time for tracking down primary sources). ] (]) 19:41, 2 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
: I just undid a revision by another IP address that uses unsubstantiated qualifiers in the description. I suspect that someone associated with the band has their own ideas of how a WP article should look. See ] for why. ] (]) 12:44, 5 October 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:44, 5 October 2013
This article was nominated for deletion on 14 December 2006 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
Copyright violation?
Hi everyone,
I'm suspecting this edit of an IP that seems to have made only this contribution to be a copyright violation, as a Google search of a random sentence
- "On the 20th October our friend, the beautiful Eileen Daly visited Mr DeWrays Recording Studio in Hampshire. Eileen laid down some backing vocals on the song "Bombers" and Nosferatu were interviewed and filmed for Eileen's New Television Series "Peek A Boo" which is being shown on Sky TV."
turns out to be also found on http://www.nosferatu.fsworld.co.uk/biography.htm and http://www.answers.com/topic/nosferatu-band. Of course, there's always the possibility of us being copied by them, but this is not very likely in this case, I'm afraid ... Anyway, the article in its current form is without question not suitable and hardly usable, as it seems to be pure advertising/self-description/fandom.
So, in conclusion, I take the liberty of reverting to the last unsuspected version. If anyone complains, show us your sources and we'll see ... -- marilyn.hanson 16:02, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
POV?
The last few sentences need to be reworded to reflect a neutral point of view per Misplaced Pages policies. Stating that a particular member "hijacked" the name of the group is hardly objective. B.Wind 23:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
10 albums
How about a list ? -- Beardo 03:05, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
100,000
The Sisters must have sold several times that for each album. -- Beardo 03:10, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- And your point?JanderVK (talk) 23:25, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Fix it up
I just did a quite edit to better present the info in the article. If anyone can find some sources to back it up, that'd be great )I'm at work, so no time for tracking down primary sources). MjolnirPants (talk) 19:41, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
- I just undid a revision by another IP address that uses unsubstantiated qualifiers in the description. I suspect that someone associated with the band has their own ideas of how a WP article should look. See WP:style for why. MjolnirPants (talk) 12:44, 5 October 2013 (UTC)