Revision as of 08:48, 4 October 2013 editMagioladitis (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers908,576 editsm →References: Remove unicode control characters (CHECKWIKI error 16) using AWB (9510)← Previous edit |
Revision as of 18:13, 13 October 2013 edit undoHangingCurve (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers100,972 edits left without a quorum after 12 DecemberNext edit → |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Soviet Union sidebar}} |
|
{{Soviet Union sidebar}} |
|
|
|
|
|
'''Soviet of the Union''' ({{lang-ru|Сове́т Сою́за}}, ''Sovet Soyuza''<ref>{{lang-uk|Рада Союзу}}; {{lang-be|Савет Саюза}}; {{lang-kk|Одақ Кеңесі}}; {{lang-lt|Sajungos Taryba}}; {{lang-mo|Cовиетул Униуний}}; {{lang-lv|Savienības Padome}}; {{lang-et|Liidu Nõukogu}}</ref>) was one of the two ]s of the ] of the ], elected on the basis of universal, equal and direct suffrage by ] in accordance with the principles of ], and with the rule that there be one deputy for every 300,000 people (until ] and the ] however, only the communist candidates were permitted to participate in the elections). As opposed to the ], the Soviet of the Union represented the interests of all of the people of the Soviet Union no matter what their nationality was. |
|
'''Soviet of the Union''' ({{lang-ru|Сове́т Сою́за}}, ''Sovet Soyuza''<ref>{{lang-uk|Рада Союзу}}; {{lang-be|Савет Саюза}}; {{lang-kk|Одақ Кеңесі}}; {{lang-lt|Sajungos Taryba}}; {{lang-mo|Cовиетул Униуний}}; {{lang-lv|Savienības Padome}}; {{lang-et|Liidu Nõukogu}}</ref>) was one of the two ]s of the ] of the ], elected on the basis of universal, equal and direct suffrage by ] in accordance with the principles of ], and with the rule that there be one deputy for every 300,000 people. Until ] and the ] however, only Communist candidates were permitted to participate in the elections). As opposed to the ], the Soviet of the Union represented the interests of all of the people of the Soviet Union no matter what their nationality was. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Soviet of the Union had the same rights and ] as the Soviet of Nationalities, including the right for ] initiative. |
|
The Soviet of the Union had the same rights and ] as the Soviet of Nationalities, including the right for ] initiative. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Soviet of the Union elected a ] (who would lead the sessions of the chamber), his 4 deputies and permanent ]s: Mandates, Legislative Proposals, ] Planning, ], Youth Affairs, Industry, Transportation and Communications, Construction and Industry of ], Agriculture, ], ], ] and ], Science and Culture, Trade, Consumer Service and Municipal Economy, ]. |
|
The Soviet of the Union elected a ] (who would lead the sessions of the chamber), his 4 deputies and permanent ]s: Mandates, Legislative Proposals, ] Planning, ], Youth Affairs, Industry, Transportation and Communications, Construction and Industry of ], Agriculture, ], ], ] and ], Science and Culture, Trade, Consumer Service and Municipal Economy, ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Soviet of the Union was effectively dissolved on 12 December, two weeks before the formal ], when the ] recalled its deputies, leaving it without a quorum. The legality of this action was questionable, since the Soviet Constitution did not allow a republic to unilaterally recall its deputies.<ref>The Russian SFSR has constitutional right to "freely seccede from the Soviet Union" (], ]), but according to USSR laws ] (enacted on 3 April 1990) and (enacted on 26 April 1990) this can be done only by a referendum and only if two-thirds of all registered voters of the republic has supported that motion. No special referendum on the seccession from the USSR was held in the RSFSR</ref> However, by this time the Soviet government had been rendered more or less impotent, and it was in no position to object. |
|
|
|
|
|
==See also== |
|
==See also== |
The Soviet of the Union was effectively dissolved on 12 December, two weeks before the formal dissolution of the Soviet Union, when the Russian SFSR recalled its deputies, leaving it without a quorum. The legality of this action was questionable, since the Soviet Constitution did not allow a republic to unilaterally recall its deputies. However, by this time the Soviet government had been rendered more or less impotent, and it was in no position to object.