| Revision as of 00:03, 9 June 2006 editDragons flight (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers, Template editors25,792 editsm Reverted edits by 68.64.65.89 (talk) to last version by Dragons flight← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:12, 26 June 2006 edit undoAudacity (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators19,849 editsm to save a little space in the header...Next edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| </center> | </center> | ||
| {{TOCright}} | |||
| ==About RfA== | ==About RfA== | ||
Revision as of 04:12, 26 June 2006
| Purge page cache if nominations haven't updated. |
- ]
- For arbitration of disputes, please see Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration
Requests for adminship (RfA) is the process by which the Misplaced Pages community decides who becomes an administrator (or sysop). Administrators have access to a few technical features that help with maintenance. A user either submits their own request for adminship (a self-nomination) or is nominated by another user. A summary of currently active requests can be found here.
Please be familiar with the administrators' reading list and how-to guide, as well as the guide to requests for adminship before submitting your request.
| Current administrators | Recently created admins | Unsuccessful admin candidacies (since Apr 2004) |
About RfA
The community grants administrator status to trusted users who are familiar with Misplaced Pages policies. Admins are held to high standards, as they are often perceived as the "official face" of Misplaced Pages. Admins should be courteous and should exercise good judgment and patience in dealing with others. Nominees should have been on Misplaced Pages long enough for people to see whether they have these qualities. Almost all admin actions are reversible. Adminship is primarily an extra responsibility as there are rules and policies that apply only to admins.
- Nomination standards
- There are no official prerequisites for adminship, other than a basic level of trust from other editors. However, some users set a variety of standards on a personal basis. You may nominate yourself. Some people apply higher standards to self-nominations, while others view them more favorably as showing initiative and desire to serve the community.
- Nomination process
- Any user in good standing may nominate any other user. Nominations remain for seven days from the time the nomination is posted on this page, during which time interested users register their opinions or make comments. At the end of that period, candidates who receive a general consensus to promote will be made admins. The bureaucrats who handle admin promotions review the discussion to see if a general consensus is present (the threshold for consensus here is roughly 75–80 percent support ). Only bureaucrats may close or de-list a nomination as a definitive promotion or non-promotion. In the case of vandalism, improper formatting or a declined or withdrawn nomination, non-bureaucrats may choose to de-list a nomination but they are never empowered to decide on whether consensus has been achieved.
- In exceptional circumstances, bureaucrats may extend the deadline or call for a revote if this will make the consensus more clear. If your nomination fails, please wait a reasonable period of time before nominating yourself again or accepting another nomination. Some candidates have succeeded again within a month, but many editors feel that at least two or even three months is better.
- How to nominate an editor for adminship
- To nominate either yourself or another user for adminship, follow the instructions on this page.
- If you would like to request assistance in creating a nomination statement, please go here.
- Commenting and expressing opinions
- Who may comment: Any Wikipedian with an account is welcome to express their opinion, including the nominator, however, expressing an opinion on one's own nomination is discouraged, and will not be counted by the closing bureaucrat.
- Who may not vote: Editors who do not have an account and/or are not logged in ("anons"). Votes of very new editors may be discounted if there is suspicion of fraud such as sockpuppetry.
- To add a comment, click the "Discuss here" link for the relevant candidate. You may then indicate whether you Support or Oppose the nomination by signing your name under the relevant heading.
- "Neutral" comments are also permitted, but are not ordinarily counted in determining percentages, although they are considered by bureaucrats in borderline cases.
- Explain your vote by including a short explanation of your reasoning, particularly when opposing a nomination.
- Always be respectful towards others in your comments.
- Threaded discussions are held in the Comments section. Long discussions are held on the discussion page of the individual nomination. Anyone may comment or discuss, including anonymous editors.