| Revision as of 17:44, 8 October 2013 editToddy1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers48,687 edits →Comments by other users: This nomination is in breach of Misplaced Pages policy Misplaced Pages:Assume good faith← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:50, 8 October 2013 edit undoVanishedUser sdu8asdasd (talk | contribs)31,778 edits →Comments by other usersNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| :*Toddy1, if you've got absolutely nothing constructive to say, then don't waste everyone else's time by commenting. If you really can't stop yourself, at least bother to look where you should place it. JoshuSasori is a CBANNED sockmaster, so '''every potential sock''' needs investigating, to either exonerate them, or prove their guilt. ] ] 08:20, 8 October 2013 (UTC) | :*Toddy1, if you've got absolutely nothing constructive to say, then don't waste everyone else's time by commenting. If you really can't stop yourself, at least bother to look where you should place it. JoshuSasori is a CBANNED sockmaster, so '''every potential sock''' needs investigating, to either exonerate them, or prove their guilt. ] ] 08:20, 8 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ::*The editor has made one edit to Misplaced Pages. There is absolutely no evidence that he/she is a sock of anyone. Or if there is, where is it? Misplaced Pages has a policy of ]. It is a breach of that policy to assume that anyone who disagrees with you is a sock puppet on the basis of no evidence other than that they disagreed with you.--] (]) 17:44, 8 October 2013 (UTC) | ::*The editor has made one edit to Misplaced Pages. There is absolutely no evidence that he/she is a sock of anyone. Or if there is, where is it? Misplaced Pages has a policy of ]. It is a breach of that policy to assume that anyone who disagrees with you is a sock puppet on the basis of no evidence other than that they disagreed with you.--] (]) 17:44, 8 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :::*The irony of you citing that statement, whilst clearly assuming bad faith yourself, is incredible. This user is '''clearly''' not new - they've cited two Misplaced Pages policies/guidelines/essays in a move request. On a Japanese film. If it's not a JoshuSasori sock, it's a sock of someone else, and it is incredibly naive to assume otherwise - unless you simply want to carry on your crusade against IIO and Hijiri. ] ] 20:50, 8 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ||
Revision as of 20:50, 8 October 2013
JoshuSasori
JoshuSasori (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/JoshuSasori/Archive.
08 October 2013
– This SPI case is open.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Papasrune (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Probably a waste of time for a 1-edit sock, but evident given the trouble on that 1 page so going through the motions for housekeeping purposes in case it gets used again. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:55, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- Anyone who disagrees with you is a sockpuppet aren't they?--Toddy1 (talk) 08:11, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Toddy1, if you've got absolutely nothing constructive to say, then don't waste everyone else's time by commenting. If you really can't stop yourself, at least bother to look where you should place it. JoshuSasori is a CBANNED sockmaster, so every potential sock needs investigating, to either exonerate them, or prove their guilt. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:20, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- The editor has made one edit to Misplaced Pages. There is absolutely no evidence that he/she is a sock of anyone. Or if there is, where is it? Misplaced Pages has a policy of Misplaced Pages:Assume good faith. It is a breach of that policy to assume that anyone who disagrees with you is a sock puppet on the basis of no evidence other than that they disagreed with you.--Toddy1 (talk) 17:44, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- The irony of you citing that statement, whilst clearly assuming bad faith yourself, is incredible. This user is clearly not new - they've cited two Misplaced Pages policies/guidelines/essays in a move request. On a Japanese film. If it's not a JoshuSasori sock, it's a sock of someone else, and it is incredibly naive to assume otherwise - unless you simply want to carry on your crusade against IIO and Hijiri. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 20:50, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: