| Revision as of 13:04, 9 October 2013 editSmsarmad (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers38,409 edits topic area of discretionary sanctions← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:15, 9 October 2013 edit undoDaniel Case (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators224,549 edits →October 2013: decline unblockNext edit → | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| == October 2013 == | == October 2013 == | ||
| {{unblock-un reviewed | 1=new username | reason=Dhruv is my name. And 2357 is a unique number attach to it. I dont understamd what is wrong with it... LOL Dhruv2357 (talk) 04:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC) | decline=Per below, plus facially this wouldn't be a block-on-sight username in any event. — ] (]) 17:15, 9 October 2013 (UTC)}} | |||
| {{tps}} I am not an administrator but according to the "block log," "active blocks," and "autoblocks" links in the blue-green box above, there are no current blocks that affect you and your account has never been specifically blocked. ]/<small><small>(])/(])</small></small> 04:43, 9 October 2013 (UTC) | {{tps}} I am not an administrator but according to the "block log," "active blocks," and "autoblocks" links in the blue-green box above, there are no current blocks that affect you and your account has never been specifically blocked. ]/<small><small>(])/(])</small></small> 04:43, 9 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :I have moved your request to the correct place at the bottom of the page. I do not see any block on your account, and specifically I see no problem with your username. I do see warnings on this page regarding disruptive editing which you should take note of. When you try to edit what message do you see? Please post the wording on this page below this message. --<font color="Red">]</font><sup><font color="Black">]</font></sup> 12:42, 9 October 2013 (UTC) | :I have moved your request to the correct place at the bottom of the page. I do not see any block on your account, and specifically I see no problem with your username. I do see warnings on this page regarding disruptive editing which you should take note of. When you try to edit what message do you see? Please post the wording on this page below this message. --<font color="Red">]</font><sup><font color="Black">]</font></sup> 12:42, 9 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:15, 9 October 2013
Hello, I'm Smsarmad. Misplaced Pages is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Terrorism seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SMS 11:24, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder, you may be blocked from editing. Nigel Ish (talk) 14:06, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Inter-Services Intelligence, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SMS 18:16, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:Smsarmad, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Mar4d (talk) 15:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Mar4d (talk) 16:08, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to conduct yourself as you have at Inter-Services Intelligence, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system. -- SMS 08:52, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
October 2013
Dhruv2357 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Requested username:
new username (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)Request reason:
Dhruv is my name. And 2357 is a unique number attach to it. I dont understamd what is wrong with it... LOL Dhruv2357 (talk) 04:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC)Decline reason:
Per below, plus facially this wouldn't be a block-on-sight username in any event. — Daniel Case (talk) 17:15, 9 October 2013 (UTC)(talk page stalker) I am not an administrator but according to the "block log," "active blocks," and "autoblocks" links in the blue-green box above, there are no current blocks that affect you and your account has never been specifically blocked. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 04:43, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- I have moved your request to the correct place at the bottom of the page. I do not see any block on your account, and specifically I see no problem with your username. I do see warnings on this page regarding disruptive editing which you should take note of. When you try to edit what message do you see? Please post the wording on this page below this message. --Anthony Bradbury 12:42, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- Also note that Smsarmad, who posted a template relating to ArbCom sanctions, is not an admin, even less a member of ArbCom, and has no authority to implement the warning contained in the template, whether it be deserved or not. --Anthony Bradbury 12:47, 9 October 2013 (UTC)