Revision as of 17:57, 9 October 2013 editA3nm (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers4,502 edits →Speedy deletion of Common Crawl: ::Thanks! --~~~~← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:36, 11 October 2013 edit undoThewolfchild (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers51,833 edits →thewolfchild's inappropriate behavior: "inappropriate" - how?Next edit → | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
:Sounds good to me. ] <small>(])</small> 15:05, 4 October 2013 (UTC) | :Sounds good to me. ] <small>(])</small> 15:05, 4 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
== thewolfchild's |
== thewolfchild's behavior == | ||
Posting here as this editor does not wish me to post on ]: | Posting here as this editor does not wish me to post on ]: |
Revision as of 21:36, 11 October 2013
This is Toddst1's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Talkback
Hello, Toddst1. You have new messages at Talk:Intellectual_disability.Message added 18:01, 2 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
- thewolfchild 18:01, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Here...
...you can this back. For the second time, stay off my talk page. - thewolfchild 19:48, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
- Second time? What are you talking about? Toddst1 (talk) 19:59, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
- First time (it hasn't been that long...) - thewolfchild 20:30, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
- Ah, sorry I didn't remember it. Toddst1 (talk) 21:38, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
- First time (it hasn't been that long...) - thewolfchild 20:30, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
October 2013
Constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. - thewolfchild 19:49, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ruth R. Benerito may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- '''Ruth Mary Rogan Benerito''' (born January 12, 1916; died October 5, 2013<ref name=nytobit>{{cite news|last=Fox|first=Margalit|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:55, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Elite Traveler magazine
Hi your last edit had the summary: "Rm off-topic / trivia. We don't list what magazines have reported on. (TW)". The Misplaced Pages article states that the magazine "caters to Ultra-High-Net-Worth consumers" but does not mention what "ultra high net worth", a financial jargon, entails. It uses a citation entitled "Private Jet Set Kicking the Bucket List". The report you removed was entitled "the new jet set" and contained specific, non-obvious demographic information about private jet demographic, which may be the intended readers of a magazine that calls itself "Elite", a subjective adjective which calls for some qualification. Income and net worth information explain ultra-high-net-worth within the context of the article. If demographic information is irrelevant, why should the article mention who the magazine is for in the first place? Shawnc (talk) 23:50, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
I found a direct citation about the magazine's reader demographics from their own website. I trust that this information is relevant in conjunction with the Forbes article. Shawnc (talk) 07:04, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me. Toddst1 (talk) 15:05, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
thewolfchild's behavior
Posting here as this editor does not wish me to post on user talk:thewolfchild:
Referring to you by terms you use to describe yourself is not a personal attack. If my username was "Todd the bumblefuck" it would not be a personal attack to be referred to as "the bumblefuck." Referring to Baseball Bugs (talk · contribs) as "Bugs" is not a personal attack.
In your case, you've labeled yourself a child: thewolfchild (talk · contribs) Referring to you as "the child" is not a personal attack.
Now, enough of your edit warring on this page, re-posting warnings here and accusations of administrative abuse. If you continue to think I have abused my administrative privileges with respect to dealing with you, for fuck's sake, take them to ANI with diffs as I have asked you several times, or take a hike and knock it off.
If it is not abundantly clear at this point, please do not post on this page unless you are notifying me of an ANI discussion regarding me. Toddst1 (talk) 19:44, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
ANI Notice
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Request interaction ban. Thank you. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:03, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Common Crawl
Hi, I see that you recently performed a speedy deletion of Common Crawl under criteria A7. I believe that "Common Crawl makes available a 100 TB web archive of web page data from 2008 to 2012 of about 6 billion webpages. Web crawl data is kept in the Amazon public datasets S3 bucket and is freely downloadable." (found in the Google cache) is a credible claim of significance: to my knowledge, no other organization provides a dataset of comparable purpose and size. Could you restore the page? You are welcome to nominate it for deletion through the usual process if you still contest its notability. Thanks! --A3 nm (talk) 10:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- done Toddst1 (talk) 20:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks! --A3 nm (talk) 17:57, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Five themes of geography
Since you are here and SPI is backlogged: Bhill579 (talk · contribs) vandalized Five themes of geography yesterday, I warned him, he stopped. Minutes ago Bhill123 (talk · contribs) was created and continues, Diff of Five themes of geography. SIMNAME/IDENT Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me. Best, Sam Sailor 19:57, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Mark Arsten blocked the latter. Sam Sailor 19:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Bhill579 doesn't seem active. If he starts up again or uses another id, I'll block them. Toddst1 (talk) 20:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)