| Revision as of 14:57, 28 October 2013 editLobsterthermidor (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers43,276 edits ←Created page with '==Reverted vexatious excessively pedantic revert== The originator of this article, Lobsterthermidor, has been involved in a two year vexatious edit war with Smal...' | Revision as of 20:21, 28 October 2013 edit undoSmalljim (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators94,142 edits Try reasoned argument - it may work!Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Reverted vexatious excessively pedantic revert== | ==Reverted vexatious excessively pedantic revert== | ||
| The originator of this article, Lobsterthermidor, has been involved in a two year vexatious edit war with Smalljim, who has developed a creepy habit of following him around WP and stamping his own mark, no matter how small, insignificant or unwarranted, on LT's articles. This is somewhat creepy, and must cease. The two edits made were classic examples of the sort of vexatious behaviour Smalljim has been exhibiting. The original text was fully supported by the sources to the satisfaction of a normal reasonable reader and have thus been re-instated. (] (]) 14:57, 28 October 2013 (UTC)) | The originator of this article, Lobsterthermidor, has been involved in a two year vexatious edit war with Smalljim, who has developed a creepy habit of following him around WP and stamping his own mark, no matter how small, insignificant or unwarranted, on LT's articles. This is somewhat creepy, and must cease. The two edits made were classic examples of the sort of vexatious behaviour Smalljim has been exhibiting. The original text was fully supported by the sources to the satisfaction of a normal reasonable reader and have thus been re-instated. (] (]) 14:57, 28 October 2013 (UTC)) | ||
| :Regarding these two changes (in isolation from other current matters) and ignoring your inappropriate allegations and use of language (yet again), I must point out that making bland assertions that you are right is not discussion. You need to convince me by reasoned argument that I am wrong. Can you do that? —]] 20:21, 28 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:21, 28 October 2013
Reverted vexatious excessively pedantic revert
The originator of this article, Lobsterthermidor, has been involved in a two year vexatious edit war with Smalljim, who has developed a creepy habit of following him around WP and stamping his own mark, no matter how small, insignificant or unwarranted, on LT's articles. This is somewhat creepy, and must cease. The two edits made were classic examples of the sort of vexatious behaviour Smalljim has been exhibiting. The original text was fully supported by the sources to the satisfaction of a normal reasonable reader and have thus been re-instated. (Lobsterthermidor (talk) 14:57, 28 October 2013 (UTC))
- Regarding these two changes (in isolation from other current matters) and ignoring your inappropriate allegations and use of language (yet again), I must point out that making bland assertions that you are right is not discussion. You need to convince me by reasoned argument that I am wrong. Can you do that? —SMALLJIM 20:21, 28 October 2013 (UTC)